[Samba] RE: FW: samba woes
Johnston, Christopher (DCSA)
cjohnston at exchange.ml.com
Wed Jun 26 12:42:02 GMT 2002
Yes it would be
Merrill Lynch / DCSA
From: Steve Langasek [mailto:vorlon at netexpress.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Jeremy Allison
Cc: Johnston, Christopher (DCSA); 'samba-technical at samba.org'; 'samba at samba.org'
Subject: Re: [Samba] RE: FW: samba woes
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:32:09AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:30:03PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Dave C-B has previously posted here details of an smbsh redesign
> > that would allow preloading of libsmbwrapper.so to work under Linux
> > in spite of the glibc changes. In fact, it would work better, as
> > his design doesn't require *any* of the current autoconf checks for
> > systems that support dlsym(RTLD_NEXT). That includes Linux, the
> > BSDs, and Solaris, AIUI, and possibly other systems where smbsh is
> > currently used.
> > It's simply a matter of digging in and recoding libsmbwrapper.
> Oh, thanks Steve, I missed that. Can you point me to the mailing list
> archives for this ? Maybe we can get it done for 3.0.x ?
Top of the thread:
It'd be great to see smbsh come back to Linux for 3.0.
More information about the samba