[Samba] Win2k, Samba 2.2.5 and LDAP

[Eddie Lania]

Hello Gerald,

I guess you are right, my mistake.
Thanks for bringing me up to speed.

But, we're talking about the 2.2.5 version here and not the latest CVS's.
That does make a difference right?

Anyway, I would like to know more about the "latest CVS's", is ldap support
now completely embedded in such a way that the smbldap-tools package is no
longer needed?

PS: I haven't been able to install and configure the latest 3.0 in such a
way that it worked like 2.2.5 does at this moment.
I am missing to much information about the new and changed parameters.

Eddie.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerald Carter" <jerry at samba.org>
To: "Eddie Lania" <e.lania at elton.nl>
Cc: <drgn65 at ufl.edu>; <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [Samba] Win2k, Samba 2.2.5 and LDAP


> On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Eddie Lania wrote:
>
> > Hello again Peter,
> >
> > You do have to add a "ou=Computers" tree to your ldap in which all the
> > computer accounts can be stored.
> > This is how Idealix preferres to do it.
> > Have you checked out their website yet? http://samba.idealix.org
> > I really advise you to do so in order to retrieve their latest smb-ldap
> > package.
>
> The last time i checked, the idelax developers wanted to house the
> authoritivate version in Samba's CVS.  If this is not the case, then they
> owe me updates at least :-)  Are there differences between their packages
> and what's in our cvs tree?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> cheers, jerry
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Hewlett-Packard                                     http://www.hp.com
>  SAMBA Team                                       http://www.samba.org
>  --                                            http://www.plainjoe.org
>  "Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed.      ISBN 0-672-32269-2
>  --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--