samba 2.2.2 install

Urban Widmark urban at teststation.com
Fri Jan 11 12:15:02 GMT 2002


On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, James Bear wrote:

> It doesn't matter because I need 2.2.2 to be the samba working.  I am
> guessing I should have uninstalled samba before I installed 2.2.2, but you
> know...and now I don't want to uninstall it because it's all I got.

But it's not working. Just get rid of it. rpm -e saves files marked as
configuration files (eg /etc/samba/smb.conf) so if you had started
configuring things it won't be lost.

Since you didn't uninstall, the old swat version was found. If you had
uninstalled it wouldn't have found anything, because you haven't told
anyone where to start swat.

But as I said before, using the rpms is easier.


> There was some advice given on how to find an rpm on the rawhide.redhat ftp
> site.  If it's there, it's tough to find.  I've got my box currently
> searching for it and we'll see, once we find it, how that works

I can't point you to your local mirror, I can point you to mine:
http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat/redhat/linux/rawhide/

And then get:
	SRPMS/SRPMS/samba-2.2.2-8.src.rpm
or:
	i386/RedHat/RPMS/samba-2.2.2-8.i386.rpm
	i386/RedHat/RPMS/samba-client-2.2.2-8.i386.rpm
	i386/RedHat/RPMS/samba-common-2.2.2-8.i386.rpm
	i386/RedHat/RPMS/samba-swat-2.2.2-8.i386.rpm

The advantage of the src.rpm is mostly that the binaries may not work if
your system is too different from the rawhide one (typically library
versions). That can be a problem for a src.rpm too, but they are usually
more tolerant.

Find a better mirror here:
	http://www.redhat.com/download/mirror.html
(the paths will be different up to the redhat part)

/Urban





More information about the samba mailing list