Samba 2.2.2 installation gives me 2.2.0a !? - THANKS
Dimitry Vink
vink at bigfoot.com
Fri Jan 11 04:57:02 GMT 2002
Both Joseph Loo and John Hawley, thanks for your answers.
The combination of your answers told me just what a I needed to know.
Regards,
Dimitry
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Loo, Joseph [mailto:loo at littongcs.com]
Verzonden: donderdag 10 januari 2002 18:56
Aan: 'Dimitry Vink'
Onderwerp: RE: Samba 2.2.2 installation gives me 2.2.0a !?
Try checking out it is started. Look at /etc/init.d/smb. check to make
sure it is starting on the /usr/local/samba directory and not the older
version.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dimitry Vink [mailto:dimitry_vink at hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:58 AM
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Samba 2.2.2 installation gives me 2.2.0a !?
Hello all,
While talking to you about my printer installation problem (still
ongoing
btw) I realised, I was still running Samba 2.2.0a instead of 2.2.2 . So,
I thought to do it all over again.
I downloaded the source package called "samba-latest.tar.gz" from the
Samba ftp server again, configured it, complied & installed it. No
problem. I did this before (at least, I thought).
Samba is running alright, but ... when I check the version it is STILL
2.2.0a !!!! (for instance command 'smbstatus' gives me the version I
don't get it, how come??!
I run SuSE 7.2 and I found the samba files installed in this directory:
/usr/local/samba/
What am I doing wrong here?? Anyone?
Thanks,
Dimitry
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
More information about the samba
mailing list