Samba 2.2.2 installation gives me 2.2.0a !? - THANKS

Dimitry Vink vink at bigfoot.com
Fri Jan 11 04:57:02 GMT 2002


Both Joseph Loo and John Hawley, thanks for your answers. 
The combination of your answers told me just what a I needed to know.

Regards,
Dimitry

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Loo, Joseph [mailto:loo at littongcs.com] 
Verzonden: donderdag 10 januari 2002 18:56
Aan: 'Dimitry Vink'
Onderwerp: RE: Samba 2.2.2 installation gives me 2.2.0a !?


Try checking out it is started. Look at /etc/init.d/smb. check to make
sure it is starting on the /usr/local/samba directory and not the older
version.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dimitry Vink [mailto:dimitry_vink at hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:58 AM
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Samba 2.2.2 installation gives me 2.2.0a !?


Hello all,

While talking to you about my printer installation problem (still
ongoing
btw) I realised, I was still running Samba 2.2.0a instead of 2.2.2 . So,
I thought to do it all over again.

I downloaded the source package called  "samba-latest.tar.gz"  from the
Samba ftp server again, configured it, complied & installed it. No
problem. I did this before (at least, I thought).

Samba is running alright, but ... when I check the version it is STILL
2.2.0a !!!!  (for instance command 'smbstatus' gives me the version I
don't get it, how come??!

I run SuSE 7.2 and I found the samba files installed in this directory:
/usr/local/samba/

What am I doing wrong here?? Anyone?

Thanks,
Dimitry

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba





More information about the samba mailing list