2.2.2 Release incredibly broken?

Noel Kelly nkelly at tarsus.co.uk
Mon Jan 7 14:24:02 GMT 2002


Thanks Jeremy.  OK - I'll get it now and give it a whirl and get back to you
at the end of the week with my findings.

Noel


-----Original Message-----
From: jra at samba.org [mailto:jra at samba.org]
Sent: 07 January 2002 22:12
To: Noel Kelly
Cc: 'rblayzor at inoc.net'; samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: 2.2.2 Release incredibly broken?


On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:05:22PM -0000, Noel Kelly wrote:
> I have had to disable oplocks also in 2.2.2 after seeing a lot of errors
in
> the logs and having smbds which become unkillable.  I thought I had solved
> that latter one when I got rid of the oplocks and recompiled everything
> (2.2.20 kernel, samba 2.2.2, ACLs) but today we had another instance when
> underload (about 40 users).  This means the raid array cannot be unmounted
> and we have to shudown and reboot messily and then check all the disks
etc.
> Not impressive.
> 
> I am going to move on to 3.0 beta and run that in our production
> envrironment - what is there to lose now ?  I just hope I can get it
working
> so it is relatively stable.

That is a little radical. Currently the SAMBA_2_2 CVS Tree is
being prepared for release as 2.2.3, and has fixes for (hopefully
all) of the bugs the original poster and you are having problems
with.

Please test it out and give us feedback ASAP if it doesn't fix
things, as we're in the process of doing Q/A before final release.

Jeremy.




More information about the samba mailing list