Wind98 not connecting to SAMBA 2.2

Fred Jackson fred at arkansaswebs.com
Mon Jan 7 00:50:06 GMT 2002


change 
	hosts allow = 192.168.1.0/24  127.0.0.1
to
	hosts allow = 192.168.1/24 127.0.0.1


?????????????
just a guess after several minutes of lookin for anything.
I have  a samba pdc working with this conf file and win98, winME and linux 
pc's on the domain.
let me know if this helps

good luck
Fred


______________________________________________________
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from bits (208.161.142.154)
# Date: 2001/08/08 16:00:44

# Global parameters
[global]
        workgroup = CASTMARK
        netbios name = SRVR2
        server string = PDC
        encrypt passwords = Yes
        allow trusted domains = No
        log level = 1
        syslog = 0
        log file = /var/log/samba/smblog
        max log size = 50000
        socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
        domain logons = Yes
        os level = 65
        preferred master = True
        domain master = True
        dns proxy = No
        wins support = Yes
        valid users = fred chuck gary jane pamela keefer nobody chris lindy 
amber
        admin users = fred
        create mask = 0764
        hosts allow = 209.38.98.99 192.168.0/24 192.168.1/24
        hosts deny = 1.1.1.1/0.0.0.0
        hide dot files = No

[netlogon]
        path = /usr/samba/lib/netlogon
        write list = fred ntadmin

[homes]
        comment = Home Directories
        read only = No
        browseable = No

[printers]
        comment = All Printers
        path = /var/spool/samba
        printable = Yes
        browseable = No

[storage]
        comment = storeage (housekeeping needed)
        path = /a3
        write list = fred gary chuck jane
        force group = smba

[drive2]
        comment = data
        path = /g1
        write list = fred gary chuck keefer jane
        force group = smba


____________________________________________________
On Sunday 06 January 2002 11:30 pm, Gordon Leibbrandt wrote:
Hi All,
I am currently running a Server (called LinuxPDC) with Red Hat Linux 7.1 and
Samba 2.2. I have a Windows 98 second edition client (called Gordon1). There
are currently only three hosts connected via an Ethernet hub.

Although PING works on both the Server IP address and Server host name I can
not get the client to communicate in any other way with the server, (eg net
view, browse etc.) I have followed all of the fault trees and trouble
shooting sheets that I can find and they all seem to indicate that
everything is OK. (I have used ping from both machines, used Testparm,
logged on as the user and password with SMBclient, used smblookup with
broadcast etc.)
Any message sent from the client to the server gets a "Destination
Unreachable" response, almost as if the server is on another sub-net with no
routing.
I have attached both my smb.conf file and a file captured using Ethereal
(this was run on the third host, a NoteBook called Gordon_NB).
I would really appreciate any help as I have been struggling for a month
with this problem.


 <<ClientServerTest2>>  <<smb.conf>>

Many Thanks.
Regards,

Gordon Leibbrandt


Voice: + 27 11 686 0600
Facsimile: +27 11 886 0332
email: <mailto:gordonl at paracon.co.za>
Web site: www.paracon.co.za <http://www.paracon.co.za>

DISCLAIMER AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTIFICATION
All information contained in this electronic transmission, including any
attachments shall be deemed confidential and proprietary to Paracon SA (Pty)
Ltd. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please
notify the sender immediately and destroy the contents. Please note that any
views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and
do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient
should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail.




More information about the samba mailing list