[Samba] Is there anything wrong with Swat for Samba 2.2.3a---
very very urgent
don_mccall at hp.com
Fri Feb 8 06:28:14 GMT 2002
were you using --with-pam as a configuration option in your previous samba?
That's the only thing I can think of
off hand - if you weren't, then swat just uses crypt and bigcrypt to encrypt
the plaintext passwd you type in and
compare it to the unix password; but --with-pam configuration will force
swat to do a pam_authenticate() to get
this job done, and perhaps there is something in your pam configuration that
is not appropriate.
This is just a guess,
From: msew-bangalore [mailto:msew-bangalore at eth.net]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:46 AM
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Is there anything wrong with Swat for Samba 2.2.3a---very
Today I've upgraded my Samba Server from 2.2.2 to 2.2.3a with the following
command Line :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba --with-smbwrapper --with-automount
--with-pam --with-quotas --with-msdfs --with-acl-support
It has compiled well without any error and I'm ready to share all my
previous share with any problem.
But when I started SWAT for some changes in smb.conf, it start giving me an
error after root password :
401 Bad Authorization
username or password incorrect
Pls help me..
Is there anything wrong with Swat for Samba 2.2.3a because earlier it was
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
More information about the samba