[Samba] weird stat()
e at arix.com
Mon Dec 23 09:01:01 GMT 2002
> well try to upgrade the server to 2.2.7a and see if thins change.
> I think we fixed some bugs with dos times in 2.2.x series.
I imagine you're running a later server... maybe you could test it for me?
it's simple just do a "stat <dir>" on a directory from its parent and
compare it to when you do a "stat *"... on my system and some RH 8.0 systems
others have tested the results vary by 1 sec, consistently.
> Btw why do you use smb to share beetwen 2 unix machines?
> Currently nfs is still better as it respect unix semantics ...
yeah, I reverted to NFS since this little fiasco... I wanted samba because I
have a mixed env and didn't want two servers running... sigh.
From: samba-admin at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at lists.samba.org]On
Behalf Of Simo Sorce
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 12:14 AM
To: Erick Calder
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] weird stat()
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 20:34, Erick Calder wrote:
> > so what matter is the kernel you have not samba version
> sorry if I didn't provide all relevant info.
> client host: RH 7.2 (2.4.18-18.7 kernel), samba 2.2.1a-4
> server host: RH 7.0 (2.4.9 kernel), samba 2.0.10-0.7
> > However, this seem a kernel bug in smbfs
> if this is a bug in the kernel... the question on which side: the client
> (which is rather recent) or the server (which is a little older)... and in
> either case then I should be posting to which mailing list?
well try to upgrade the server to 2.2.7a and see if thins change.
I think we fixed some bugs with dos times in 2.2.x series.
Btw why do you use smb to share beetwen 2 unix machines?
Currently nfs is still better as it respect unix semantics ...
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
More information about the samba