[Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

[Dragan Krnic]

On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:43:40 John H Terpstra wrote:
>On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dragan Krnic wrote:
>> In another thread John Terpstra rightly positions reiserfs 
>> somewhere between ext2 and ext3, which means ahead of ext3. 

>And for waht it is worth, even though I found ReiserFS the poorest
>performing, I still use it on my file server. So, go figure, not 
>everyone needs a Maserati!

Have I misquoted you, John? In the thread about an ideal samba server
(Tyan, Athlons, IDE RAID - as if I wrote it) you said ext2 is by the
most efficient and ext3 the least, with reiserfs somewhere between.
Now it's the poorest performing. Have you got some new facts?


_____________________________________________________________
Get 25MB, POP3, Spam Filtering with LYCOS MAIL PLUS for $19.95/year.
http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus&ref=lmtplus