[Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?
dkrnic at lycos.com
Sat Dec 14 19:34:01 GMT 2002
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:43:40 John H Terpstra wrote:
>On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dragan Krnic wrote:
>> In another thread John Terpstra rightly positions reiserfs
>> somewhere between ext2 and ext3, which means ahead of ext3.
>And for waht it is worth, even though I found ReiserFS the poorest
>performing, I still use it on my file server. So, go figure, not
>everyone needs a Maserati!
Have I misquoted you, John? In the thread about an ideal samba server
(Tyan, Athlons, IDE RAID - as if I wrote it) you said ext2 is by the
most efficient and ext3 the least, with reiserfs somewhere between.
Now it's the poorest performing. Have you got some new facts?
Get 25MB, POP3, Spam Filtering with LYCOS MAIL PLUS for $19.95/year.
More information about the samba