[Samba] oplocks and samba 2.2.7

Simo Sorce simo.sorce at xsec.it
Fri Dec 13 22:48:01 GMT 2002

On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 23:24, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:

> > I can't not understand with debian cannot update packeges that are in
> > the stable version ... but that's a debian problem not samba related ...
> > 
> Well, I think I understand and approve of the reasons: it's so packages 
> can get tested properly before you run them on your 'stable' server.

That's fine with development versions, but samba stable is ... well ...
stable :-)

> And they backport security fixes, so you get the best of both worlds, 
> generally.

Yes generally it is a really good idea

> If you want latest features, run 'testing' or 'unstable'.

No on my servers I use stable too, it was not a general question, but a
specific one toward samba.

Samba 2.2.3a has been realeased on february the 6th, they are 10 (ten)
months !!! And 2.2.7a contains *lot* of bugfixes that will make also
woody users a lot more happy.


Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20021213/46e771eb/attachment.bin

More information about the samba mailing list