[Samba] Any experience with Latest S

[Robert Adkins]

Jerry,

	While that is true, is it also possible that they could have "fixed"   
something else that is unrelated, but could potentially cause minor or   
major issues with Samba?

Regards,
Robert Adkins II
IT Manager/Buyer
Impel Industries, Inc.
Ph. 586-254-5800
Fx. 586-254-5804


 -----Original Message-----
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry at samba.org]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Robert Adkins
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Any experience with Latest SMB Patch fro

   

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Robert Adkins wrote:

> "...Windows Server Message Block (SMB) protocol which could enable   
group
> policy on domain controllers to be modified. Flaws in cryptographic
> signing implementation used by MS in SMB are the root cause of the
> problem. These flaws are fixed in Win XP SP1 or through a separate
> patch, released yesterday, which is designed to address the problem on
> Windows 2000 boxes."
>
> 	Does this change in any way affect Samba? Has anyone tested out
> this patch before spreading it across all their Windows 2K/XP
> workstations?

Should not effect us since Samba does not implement SMB signing.




cheers, jerry
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Hewlett-Packard            ------------------------- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team                 ---------------------- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key                  ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ISBN 0-672-32269-2         "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed
 "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there."
                            --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE9+iAQIR7qMdg1EfYRAv5nAKC04/GZlhKIYtUqReDCRbHP72C9KwCdGAWZ
t3NjIP1HD2kAGRu2M76a7aM=
=e7ed
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----