kernel oplocks 2.2.1a

[Gerald Carter]

On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, ian j hart wrote:

> > I will up date the man page next week.
>
> I know, I looked at the code. But, having correct documentation does
> matter.

I was pointing out that having 'kernel oplocks = yes'
causes no harm if your kernel doesn't support it.

> The point is that the two statements above are contradictory, and if
> the first is true then the default value for FreeBSD is wrong. I was
> trying to narrow down a problem with locking. There are 7 options
> (since level2 oplocks requires oplocks). That's a lot of permutations.
> Removing an option which does nothing saves time and effort.
>
> Since the documentation comes in many formats, you may find it
> easier to just change the default value for FreeBSD in smb.conf.default.

It's all in sgml/DocBook source.  I already agreed with you and
said I would update the docs next week.  Sorry if I wasn't clear.








cheers, jerry
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 www.samba.org              SAMBA Team              jerry_at_samba.org
 www.plainjoe.org                                jerry_at_plainjoe.org
 --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--