Samba 2.0.7 problems (on RedHat 7.0)

[Urban Widmark]

On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Dimitrie Paun wrote:

> Right. But I need it 'cause I need non-root users mount the thing...
> Should not be a problem, right?

"user" does not give you that. Not with smbfs ... (look at the smbmnt 
manpage, it's mostly correct except that the user needs to own the dir)


> Is -32 in 2.0.7 the same as -104 in 2.2.1b? Am I doing any better, or is it
> the same problem?

Yes. Different network code in the kernel, so the error is different (see 
asm/errno.h).

> Add it to the fstab? Like so:

Yes.


> OK, I'll try to reproduce the problem with the above setting. I guess I need
> to make the smbmount.log writable by anyone. But, I remember that I needed
> to make smbmnt suid, shouldn't that be enough?

No, smbmnt does not log anything.

/Urban