2.2 Alpha3 - how stable is it?

[GL Fournerat]

Personally, I wouldn't even use a _beta_ version in a production
environment... much less an alpha.  I run into enough problems with
production releases (MS) to keep me busy enough as it is.  Installing an
alpha release on my home/lab network might be something I try only after
I've backed up everything I can backup.

Gary



----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Marcus" <CharlesM at media-Brokers.com>
To: <samba at us5.samba.org>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 6:48 AM
Subject: 2.2 Alpha3 - how stable is it?


> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering what the feeling was of those on this list as to how
stable
> this alpha is?  Is it useable in a production environment for basic file
> sharing of a shared database (ACT)?
>
> The reason I am asking is I am having major file corruption issues with
> Win2K clients using 2.07, and if the suggestions already made do not fix
the
> problem, I would be willing to try it, if it is (useable, that is).
>
> Otherwise, this will put a MAJOR delay in my Win2K->Linux conversion
project
> for our network, and this would be a definite 'not-good' as far as my
boss's
> already skeptical attitude toward making this change.
>
> Thanks
>
> Charles Marcus
> I.T. Director
> Media Brokers International
> CharlesM at Media-Brokers.com
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba