Public shares
Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO
ruben at mrbrklyn.com
Wed Mar 21 05:17:17 GMT 2001
Yes
I can see the logic to that.
I originally tried to set everything up by group on the Unix side.
Ruben
On 2001.03.21 00:03:26 -0500 David Rankin wrote:
Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO wrote:
> Yes
>
> We added
>
> force user = jam to the service
>
> Because it was only working with user jam. But then when two users on 2
> workstations
> use the program....it fails....which I think is a defined behavior for
SMB
>
> Ruben
>
Here is a possible fix for your situation. I am doing what I think it is
you
are trying to do and I have no problems with my samba share. Instead of
"force
user", I use "force group" and I just make sure that all the users I want
to
have read/write access to all the files on the share are members of that
group.
I have included the share from my smb.conf file below for your reference. I
think this will accomplish what you are trying to do and may get around
your
problem.
[Rankin-Bertin]
comment = Rankin-Bertin PLLC
path = /home/samba/rbpllc
valid users = @rbpllc
force group = rbpllc
admin users = david
writeable = Yes
map archive = Yes
inherit permissions = Yes
--
David Rankin
Nacogdoches, Texas
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
Brooklyn Linux Solutions
http://www.mrbrklyn.com
http://www.brooklynonline.com
1-718-382-5752
More information about the samba
mailing list