Sysadmin Question

[jfollansbee at att.net]

Uh, actually I didn't configure --with-smbmount. I 
didn't see that this was important in the documentation. 
Did I goof?

Joe
--
Joe Follansbee
Streaming Media Producer/Consultant
206-932-7578
http://www.follansbeeconsulting.com
		
	
			
> You could rpm -e the old installation. It likely won't harm anything. I
> would just make sure you your backed up your smb.conf file, just in case.
> You can have conflicts with the old binaries. They will be in your path,
> whereas the new binaries are not in your path, since they are in
> /usr/local/samba/bin. Thus, if you run smbmount without a path, you'll run
> the old binary.
> (You did configure samba with --with-smbmount ?)
> Joel
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:23:52AM +0000, jfollansbee at att.net wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I just installed Samba 2.2.2, using the default 
> > installation directories, on a RH 7.2 system. It seems 
> > to be up and running fine, but I still have the old 
> > 2.2.1a files installed the way RH likes them. I'm not a 
> > guru, so should I worry about this? Should I uninstall 
> > the 2.2.1a files? Will there be any conflicts? Should I 
> > care?
> > 
> > Many thanks.
> > 
> > Joe
> > 
> > --
> > Joe Follansbee
> > Streaming Media Producer/Consultant
> > 206-932-7578
> > http://www.follansbeeconsulting.com
> > 		
> > 	
> > 			
> > 
> > -- 
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba