%U and %u functionality change in 2.2??

[Gerald Carter]

On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Herb Lewis wrote:

> Gerald Carter wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Jason Haar wrote:
> >
> > > A "me too". There definitely appears to be a problem with "%u" expansion.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah.  Jeremy found it and posted a patch for 2.2.0.  Check the list
> > archives.  Will be fixed in 2.2.1.  Sorry.
> >
> > Cheers, jerry
> > SAMBA Team
> >
> I think the patch Jeremy commited only changed the "case" of the value
> returned. I didn't look to see if it changed calling advanced_sub
> vs basic_sub on things like the include line and I believe the log
> file name line. %U and %u are not processed in basic_sub.

I thought he moved them in.  Hmmm...Need to slow down when I
read then.  I'll look into it.  Thanks.






Cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
   /\  Gerald (Jerry) Carter                     Professional Services
 \/    http://www.valinux.com/  VA Linux Systems   gcarter at valinux.com
       http://www.samba.org/       SAMBA Team          jerry at samba.org
       http://www.plainjoe.org/                     jerry at plainjoe.org

       "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
                                - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )