Best Distro for Samba
Eric Sisler
esisler at westminster.lib.co.us
Thu Apr 19 16:16:20 GMT 2001
Dan Pupek <dnkp at swbell.net>
First off, it would be best to configure your e-mail client for plain text,
at least to this list. Many people use e-mail clients that don't deal well
with anything other than plain text.
>Ok, I have a question.
>What is the best Linux distribution for Samba?
>Mandrake is giving me lots of trouble and I think it is because of all the
>RPMs that install with it. Will Samba work better on a kernel built from
>Scratch? Better on BSD? Solaris? What is the best? I am setting up a file
>server and maybe a squid proxy.
I'm not sure there's really a "best" distro for running Samba. It depends
largely on what you're comfortable with and what your needs are. We've
been running Samba here since 1998 on RedHat and I've been happy with it,
barring some trouble with SMP kernels.
I don't have any experience with Mandrake but what kind of problems is it
giving you? If you're concerned about the number of RPM's installed out of
the box, you can always 'rpm -e [packagename]' to remove them. If you're
not sure what a package does, 'rpm -qi [packagename]' will give you some
detail and finally 'rpm -qa | sort | more' will list all the packages
installed. RedHat and other distros will typically install many packages
you probably don't want/need but rpm makes it really easy to
manage/remove/etc them. Be sure to keep up with your vendors updated RPMs,
especially the security related ones.
>Does squid have problems with Samba?
Squid and Samba are unrelated services. That said, Squid & Samba ran
side-by-side here on the same server for quite some time with no
problems. Squid will use as much RAM and disk space as you let it so you
may want to go heavy on the RAM and put the Squid disk cache on its own
physical disk (fast SCSI disk recommended). Again, this depends on your
setup - how many clients will you be serving with Squid and Samba?
>I have here ipchains cause samba problems?
Barring incorrect ipchains rules, no. ;-)
>I'm not dumb, so be frank with me. I know somebody out there is running a
>clean samba setup with all the bells and whistles how do you do it? Also I
>run no NT or Win2000 only 98. So I would like samba to be the PDC. WINs
>server if that's the best route.
We have Win '95 clients here, but are moving to a combination of NT
workstation and 2000. There are a handful of '98 clients but not many, but
I don't think they're significantly different than '95 where samba is
concerned. Samba can act as a PDC for 98/98 clients although interaction
between a Samba PDC and an NT PDC/BDC is limited AFAIK - read the
documentation on the samba website for more information. I'd recommend
enabling the WINS server portion of samba since WINS resolves by broadcast
without a WINS server.
There's good documentation available on the Samba website (
http://www.samba.org ) as well as links to a number of excellent books
written by members of the Samba team (thanks guys!). "Using Samba" is
available in HTML format from the O'Reilly website and is included as part
of the 2.0.7 RPM I have. Consider the FAQs and smb.conf documentation
required reading before getting started.
-Eric
Eric Sisler
Library Computer Technician
Westminster Public Library
Westminster, CO, USA
esisler at westminster.lib.co.us
Linux - don't fear the Penguin.
Want to know what we use Linux for?
Visit http://gromit.westminster.lib.co.us/linux
More information about the samba
mailing list