Users can map shares without password in domain-security mode
Christian Seip
Christian.Seip at t-online.de
Wed Sep 20 17:09:13 GMT 2000
Once again! :-)
Jeffry Smith schrieb::
> > [public]
> > path = /shares/public
> > read only = No
> > browseable = Yes
> > guest ok = Yes
> I assume /shares/public is on the shared storage
Your assumption is correct.
> > [pub]
> > path = /home/public
> > read only = No
> > browseable = Yes
> > guest ok = yes
> same assumption
The same is true for this one.
> Since it works with one, but not with the cluster, my guess would be
> that the two machines in the cluster are not seeing things the same.
I'm still in testing mode, so the cluster software is disabled and I
start samba
manually. So far it's a single standard samba server.
> You're running useradd on one machine, so it knows about the person,
> but not on the other. I'll have to do some testing, see what happens.
If the other node doesn't know the person connecting, it creates the
account. That's
why I use the "add user script". The result is a bad mixture of UIDs.
The same UID
can belong to different user accounts on the nodes. I said that before
and I'm going
to fix that with some sort of "mypasswd" on the shared storage.
> Suspect it would need a script to copy the passwd file to the second
> node, or run useradd on the second node (preference would be some kind
> of copying, to ensure the systems see the same passwd file, but I
> don't know about the effect of changing the passwd file under a
> running system).
I'll modify the smb_useradd.pl in order to keep both userlists
synchronized.
Actually, I won't create a user on both nodes at the same time. That
will work most
of the time but not if the second node is down. I'll keep a list with
usernames and
UIDs in which I look up a username to get its existing UID. Sorry, it's
badly
explained but I think you get the picture.
Regards,
Christian (same person, different mail-address)
More information about the samba
mailing list