Samba performance compared to Windows 98
kpayne at cirvisinc.com
Tue Oct 31 23:23:03 GMT 2000
Thanks, that helped some. Now, it's about 140%-150% slower than 98.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-admin at us5.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at us5.samba.org]On
> Behalf Of Mike Fedyk
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 3:09 PM
> To: kpayne at cirvisinc.com
> Cc: samba at samba.org
> Subject: Re: Samba performance compared to Windows 98
> > socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536
> > SO_SNDBUF=65536
> try SO_RCVBUF=4500 SO_SNDBUF=4500
> or 4096
> or 1500
> bigger buffers don't always help.
> Mike Fedyk "They that can give up essential liberty
> Information Systems to obtain a little temporary safety
> Match Mail Productions Inc. deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> mfedyk at matchmail.com Ben Franklin
More information about the samba