Samba performance compared to Windows 98
Kim Payne
kpayne at cirvisinc.com
Tue Oct 31 17:12:14 GMT 2000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-admin at us5.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at us5.samba.org]On
> Behalf Of Tom Syroid
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 11:17 AM
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: Re: Samba performance compared to Windows 98
>
>
> Do you have "socket options = TCP_NODELAY" in your [global] section?
Yes, that option is there. I have also tried other options dealing with
sockets, but none improve performance greatly.
>
> Hard to troubleshoot without a snapshot of your current smb.conf [global]
> section...
I forgot to include that...oops. Here is the current [global] section.
[global]
workgroup = CRVDOMAIN
server string = Samba Server %v on (%L)
netbios name = CRVSRV1
guest ok = no
dead time = 0
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = no
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/lib/smbpasswd
null passwords = yes
username map = /usr/local/samba/lib/smbusers
socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536
SO_SNDBUF=65536
read raw = yes
write raw = yes
getwd cache = yes
read size = 1024
wins support = yes
dns proxy = no
preserve case = yes
short preserve case = yes
default case = upper
Thanks,
Kim
>
> /tom
>
> --On Tuesday, October 31, 2000 10:40 AM -0500 Kim Payne
> <kpayne at cirvisinc.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a small network with 12-15 users. In an effort to
> start migrating
> > to a client/server architechure instead of a peer-to-peer, I
> have removed
> > Windows 98 from a Intel PII 600 mhz / 512 MB SDRAM / 3Com FastEtherlink
> > NIC and installed Linux 2.2.17. I configured Samba to share
> files to our
> > Windows 98 clients.
> >
> > The write performance of Samba seems to be much slower (on
> the order of
> > 200% slower) than Windows 98 on the same hardware. I have read the
> > documentation on the options to improve performance listed in
> Using Samba
> > and in the docs directory. I am unable to find an option to bring the
> > performance on par with Windows 98 when opening Microsoft
> Access databases
> > from the shared drive.
> >
> > Does anyone know of an option I can change or have any
> other pointers I
> > can use to try to improve the performance? Thanks for any
> help you can
> > provide.
> >
> > Kim Payne
> > CiRViS, Inc.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the samba
mailing list