Reply-To: header

[James Nord]

Well I dont want to be one of those "me too" so I wont.

a) I don't like this
 i) If i write a message and someone replies I want to be able to
fileter it out so it gets highlighted.$
    I don't always have the time to search my folders for a reply to my
message that may or may not have arrived!"
 i) If you dont want this then its easy not to do with simple procmail
and formail

b) You can post to the list without being a memember.  Do you want to do
a check on each mail you receive to see if they are a member of the list
and hence should also CC them?

My 2cents.

/James

$from .procmailrc

##########
## Remove duplicate mails.

:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 $HOME/Mail/msgid.cache

####################################################
## To Me
####

:0:
* ^TO(james|nord|teilo)(,|@cdt|$)
$DEFAULT

####################################################
## samba at samba.org list
## if you prefer your replies to go to the list box then put this rule
before to me!

:0:
* ^TOsamba@(.*\.)?samba.org
lists/samba




Tom Syroid wrote:
> 
> You certainly have my vote. I've spent more time reorganizing my server
> rules for this list than any other I'm a member of...
> 
> /tom
> 
> --On Wednesday, November 01, 2000 7:31 PM -0800 Mike Fedyk
> <mfedyk at matchmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Who wants to vote for a reply-to: header pointing back to the samba list?
> >
> > I end up pressing reply to all for most of my replies and have two
> > messages come to me, one through bcc and one through the list.  I'm
> > wondering if there are more people that would like the header too.
> > Anyone?
> > --
> >
> > Mike Fedyk                   "They that can give up essential liberty
> > Information Systems           to obtain a little temporary safety
> > Match Mail Productions Inc.   deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> > mfedyk at matchmail.com                                   Ben Franklin
> >

--
Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet.
	Douglas Adams