Next stable version of Samba.

Jeremy Allison jeremy at
Wed May 17 21:43:12 GMT 2000

"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
>         This makes sense to me, but I have a question.  Why
> 2.2 and not 2.1?  Are we now going to embark on the odd/even
> convention of the Linux kernel (odd minor is development,
> evem minor is release).  If so, I have to say that I'm all
> for it.  I just want to know if that's officially the
> road we are about to walk down.

Yes that's the plan. Even minor numbers mean a "stable"
release. It works well for Linux so I decided to steal it :-).


Buying an operating system without source is like buying
a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.

More information about the samba mailing list