Next stable version of Samba.
Jeremy Allison
jeremy at valinux.com
Wed May 17 21:43:12 GMT 2000
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
>
> This makes sense to me, but I have a question. Why
> 2.2 and not 2.1? Are we now going to embark on the odd/even
> convention of the Linux kernel (odd minor is development,
> evem minor is release). If so, I have to say that I'm all
> for it. I just want to know if that's officially the
> road we are about to walk down.
Yes that's the plan. Even minor numbers mean a "stable"
release. It works well for Linux so I decided to steal it :-).
Jeremy.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Buying an operating system without source is like buying
a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
--------------------------------------------------------
More information about the samba
mailing list