Microsoft Knowledge Base Q168821
mike at yew-tree.co.uk
Thu Mar 9 23:46:50 GMT 2000
In your message regarding Re: Microsoft Knowledge Base Q168821 dated
Fri, 10 Mar 2000 08:02:51 +1100, Mike Bostock said that ...
> In your message regarding Re: Microsoft Knowledge Base Q168821 dated
> Fri, 10 Mar 2000 04:26:06 +1100, Stephen L Arnold said that ...
> > David Collier-Brown <davecb at canada.sun.com> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: Microsoft Knowledge Base Q168821
> > > I haven't noticed this one mentioned on the list...
> > http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q168/8/21.ASP?LNG=ENG&
> > I agree with Dave. Although it's typical M$ propaganda ("to resolve this problem, disable the
> samba computers...) the proper setup should be addressed in the samba docs
> (and maybe an additional
> option in smb.conf). I did get a good laugh out of it, though...
> You guys have missed the point. M$ has admitted that Samba is better than
> NT when they say.... (of Samba) to behave much like a LAN Server or
> Windows NT Server machine, only with added functionality and flexibility
> designed to make life easier for administrators.
Forget what I said, I missed reading the bit:
[From the Samba FAQ]
Home: mike at yew-tree.co.uk
Work: mike at wistaria.co.uk
Work Tel: 01363-773377
Fax: 01363-777729 (Office Hours)
More information about the samba