Microsoft Knowledge Base Q168821

[Mike Bostock]

In your message regarding Re: Microsoft Knowledge Base Q168821 dated  
Fri, 10 Mar 2000 08:02:51 +1100, Mike Bostock said that ...

>  In your message regarding Re: Microsoft Knowledge Base Q168821 dated  
>  Fri, 10 Mar 2000 04:26:06 +1100, Stephen L Arnold said that ...
>  
> >  David Collier-Brown <davecb at canada.sun.com> wrote:
> >  
> >  Subject: Re: Microsoft Knowledge Base Q168821
> >  
> > > I haven't noticed this one mentioned on the list...
> >  
> >  http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q168/8/21.ASP?LNG=ENG&
¿©Æt
>  
>  
>  ¿‡
SA=AL&SA=AL
> >  
> >  I agree with Dave.  Although it's typical M$ propaganda ("to resolve this problem, disable the
>  samba computers...) the proper setup should be addressed in the samba docs
>  (and maybe an additional
>  option in smb.conf).  I did get a good laugh out of it, though...
> >  
>  
>  You guys have missed the point.  M$ has admitted that Samba is better than
>  NT when they say.... (of Samba) to behave much like a LAN Server or
>  Windows NT Server machine, only with added functionality and flexibility
>  designed to make life easier for administrators. 
>  
>  :-))))))))

Forget what I said, I missed reading the bit:

[From the Samba FAQ]



-- 
Mike Bostock
Home: mike at yew-tree.co.uk
Work: mike at wistaria.co.uk
Work Tel: 01363-773377
Fax:  01363-777729 (Office Hours)
http://www.toothfairy.co.uk/