Multiple smbd processes generated
William Jojo
jojowil at hvcc.edu
Tue Feb 29 14:22:25 GMT 2000
I've seen this on AIX 4.3.2 with 2.0.6. We chalked it up to Win2k because we had
all NT4 and one NT4 box upgraded to Lose2k which was part of the domain at that
point. We had to reboot on two consecutive Tuesdays (no relevance really) and
we've been fine ever since...perhaps we picked the wrong culprit?
We had 156 blocked processes waiting for a resource - what I have no idea
because the log was barren. We had 1342 processes that were smbd's. And get this
- LOTS of idle - NOT wait time.
Bill
Andrew Boswell wrote:
>
> We have an occasional problem which manifests with multiple processes
> being created for a particular user. For example, for a user "xy004":
>
> xy004 8463 0.0 0.0 6.02M 0K ?? IW 11:48:59 0:02.02 smbd
> xy004 9426 0.0 0.0 5.99M 0K ?? IW 11:52:18 0:03.68 smbd
> xy004 10433 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:17:20 0:00.85 smbd
> xy004 12211 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:29:50 0:00.88 smbd
> xy004 12588 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:16:05 0:00.55 smbd
> xy004 12968 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:18:40 0:00.85 smbd
> xy004 13069 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:19:55 0:00.86 smbd
> xy004 13223 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:21:10 0:00.83 smbd
> xy004 13396 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:22:27 0:00.86 smbd
> xy004 13579 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:23:42 0:00.82 smbd
> xy004 13772 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:24:52 0:00.87 smbd
> xy004 13887 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:26:07 0:00.83 smbd
> xy004 14064 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:27:18 0:00.82 smbd
> xy004 14220 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:28:35 0:00.85 smbd
> xy004 14743 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:31:05 0:00.98 smbd
> xy004 14963 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:32:30 0:00.93 smbd
> xy004 15609 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:33:55 0:00.87 smbd
>
> This has manifested in two ways:
>
> 1) For just a single user. The processes remain following
> disconnection from Samba, and *CANNOT* be killed (with "kill -9" etc).
> In this situtaion they have status <defunct>, and the user cannot
> reconnect to Samba. This has caused a problem to the user - they
> couldn't connect to Samba, except if the Samba server was rebooted. As
> we have parallel servers, we have however been able to tell users to
> use a different server.
>
> 2) For multiple users. This has happened once, but required an
> emergency reboot of the server due to the process table limit being
> reached - the above process list was obtained just before shutting down
> the server in this case.
>
> We are using Compaq Tru64 Unix (ex- Digital Unix) and Samba 2.0.6.
>
> Has anyone else encountered these problems and know what causes them?
> I can find no evidence in the log files of anything wrong for the user
> to which this happens.
>
> TIA
>
> Andrew
>
> ======================================================================
> Dr Andrew Boswell email : A.Boswell at uea..ac.uk
> School Liaison Consultant phone : +44-1603-593856
> IT and Computing Services fax : +44-1603-593467
> University of East Anglia
> Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
--
/------------------------------------------------------\
| |
| William E. Jojo, Jr. |
| |
| Senior Systems and Network Specialist |
| |
| Hudson Valley Community College |
| |
| (518) 629 7540 |
| |
| jojowil at hvcc.edu |
| |
\------------------------------------------------------/
We are young wandering the face of the earth
Wondering what our dreams might be worth
Learning that we're only immortal...
...for a limited time
More information about the samba
mailing list