SAMBA digest 2249

[Dominique Muller]

Unknown
----- Original Message -----
From: <samba at samba.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA <samba at samba.org>
Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 10:37 AM
Subject: SAMBA digest 2249


>     SAMBA Digest 2249
>
> For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/
> Topics covered in this issue include:
>
>   1) Re: redhat->nt printing problem after samba upgrade
> by   <tridge at linuxcare.com>
>   2) Re: redhat->nt printing problem after samba upgrade
> by   <tridge at linuxcare.com>
>   3) RE: SMBMount losing connections to NT server
> by   DON_MCCALL at HP-USA-om1.om.hp.com
>   4) NT 4.0 SP4 -> SP5: Permission denied?
> by   Lars Martin <lars at softwarebuero.de>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date:   Sun, 26 Sep 1999 21:36:04 +1000
> From:   <tridge at linuxcare.com>
> To:     strombrg at nis.acs.uci.edu
> Subject: Re: redhat->nt printing problem after samba upgrade
> Message-ID: <19990926113616Z12866488-23442+6859 at samba.anu.edu.au>
>
> > session request to LANA.PS.UCI.EDU failed
> > session request to *SMBSERVER failed
>
> this usually means you have a "hosts allow" or "hosts deny" line that
> prevents access.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:   Sun, 26 Sep 1999 21:46:09 +1000
> From:   <tridge at linuxcare.com>
> To:     strombrg at nis.acs.uci.edu
> Subject: Re: redhat->nt printing problem after samba upgrade
> Message-ID: <19990926114611Z12863645-23442+6861 at samba.anu.edu.au>
>
> > >         /dcs/packages/samba/bin/smbclient
file://lana.ps.uci.edu/lwp600
> -P -N
>
> > > session request to LANA.PS.UCI.EDU failed
> > > session request to *SMBSERVER failed
>
> if the server is a Samba box then it is probably a "hosts deny"
> problem as I mentioned.
>
> If it is a Win9X box then change the smbclient line to this:
>
>       /dcs/packages/samba/bin/smbclient file://lana/lwp600 -I
lana.ps.uci.edu
> -P -N
>
> Win9X doesn't accept *SMBSERVER and doesn't like being called anything
> but its primary netbios name.
>
> Cheers, Tridge
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:   Sun, 26 Sep 1999 08:09:37 -0400
> From:   DON_MCCALL at HP-USA-om1.om.hp.com
> Subject: RE: SMBMount losing connections to NT server
> Message-ID: <H000052412404971 at MHS>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="BDY.TXT"
> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="BDY.TXT"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Hi all,
> Just a thought - I'm running Samba on HP-UX 10.20,11.0, and MPE/iX, so
> no
> SMBMount for
> me.  But Steve's idea that an update to files on the smbserver during a
> period
> of inactivity on the smbclient being involved led me to question if this
> could
> be an issue with the 'change notify' NT Transact mechanism;  Some
> clients, when
> doing a treeconnect to an smbshare, will then send an NT Transact smb
> with a
> function code (I think '4', don't remember at the moment) called 'change
>
> notify'.  The smb server, if it supports it, then will keep this machine
> in a
> list to 'notify' via an 'notify change' nt transact smb when anything
> changes
> on the tree (delete, rename, etc).  Possibly if NT needs to 'notify' the
> client
> after some period of inactivity has caused the smbmount client to drop
> the
> connection, since the request is being generated by the SERVER, this is
> causing
> a problem????
> Just a thought - if someone with linux and smbmount wants to test this
> out, it
> should be pretty simple to determine...
> Don
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:   Mon, 27 Sep 1999 08:55:21 +0200
> From:   Lars Martin <lars at softwarebuero.de>
> To:     samba at samba.org
> Subject: NT 4.0 SP4 -> SP5: Permission denied?
> Message-ID: <99092709045702.00635 at mohammed>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
>
> Hi,
>
> I've upgraded an NT 4.0 Client from SP4 to SP5. Now I'm unable
> to mount a shared medium from the samba server, because the
> user authentication failed. After downgrading all things are well.
> Is this a problem of NT password encryption? I read NT 4.0 SP4
> uses encrypted passwords already?!
>
> The samba server is running SuSE 6.1 with Samba 2.0.3.
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
> --
> ________________________________________________________________
> Lars Martin                          lars at softwarebuero.de
> softwarebuero m&b (SMB)              http://www.softwarebuero.de
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of SAMBA Digest 2249
> ************************
>