HEAD and 2.0.4b - interworking?
Paul L. Lussier
plussier at baynetworks.com
Fri May 28 13:48:19 GMT 1999
In a message dated: Fri, 28 May 1999 19:57:59 +1000
George Cameron said:
>Did I understand from something Jeremy said recently that a recommended
>mode of operation for those wishing to try the full PDC support might
>be:
>
> 1. all file servers running production version (currently 2.0.4b)
> 2. single PDC machine running HEAD branch
>
>in order to get the stability and performance of the production version
>while still being able to use the latest PDC functionality?
>
>In other words, should I expect that the two different versions should
>inter-work successfully?
I'm not sure I understand the question. Are you saying you want to run one
system as a PDC that does nothing but user/password authentication, and run
other systems that act specifically as file/print servers?
Hmmm, that seems like it might solve my problem of password updating. Would
you then set 'security = server' and then 'password server = <hostname>'
pointing toward the system acting as the PDC on the file/print servers?
If that works, and is stable, it would definitely solve some of my problems :)
I think I could then run the PDC code on my NIS master in order to get the
unix passwords updated easily, but not overload it with file/print serving
requests.
Does that sound like a reasonable/stable thing to do? Are others using this
model? How well does it work?
Thanks,
--
Seeya,
Paul
----
plussier at baynetworks.com
Broadband Technology Division - Bay Networks (now a Nortel Company, Eh? :)
If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
More information about the samba
mailing list