UNSUBSCRIBE
Dave Hazelton
hazeltod at enc.edu
Tue Feb 23 13:00:50 GMT 1999
> SAMBA Digest 1994
>
>For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/
>Topics covered in this issue include:
>
> 1) A message you sent has inappropriate language and has been blocked.
> by <MailAdmin at transport.qld.gov.au>
> 2) Re: samba question
> by RICK_ at t-online.de (JUERGEN ANZER)
> 3) Problems With Configure Script On Solaris 2.6
> by "Matthew Jamison" <xmj at cypress.com>
> 4) Case sensitive passwords in win95? Possible?
> by Rob Naccarato <rob.naccarato at sheridanc.on.ca>
> 5) Re: Input/output error
> by James O'Kane <jo2y at jprc.com>
> 6) Large uptime
> by Joel <jwknight at cyberlink.bc.ca>
> 7) Re: can't get in Network Neighborhood - need help
> by Greg.J.Pinto at trw.com (Greg J. Pinto)
> 8) FW: Samba Performance
> by Robert Seese <rseese at rrsinfo.com>
> 9) FW: Samba Performance
> by Robert Seese <rseese at rrsinfo.com>
> 10) FW: Samba Performance
> by Robert Seese <rseese at rrsinfo.com>
> 11) RE: Samba Performance
> by Robert Seese <rseese at rrsinfo.com>
> 12) Re: Input/output error
> by Matt Chapman <m.chapman at student.unsw.edu.au>
> 13) windows nt -> samba server on unix: slow login
> by ravi narayan <ravi at streamcenter.com>
> 14) RE: Samba Performance
> by Robert Seese <rseese at rrsinfo.com>
> 15) Samba 2.0.2 + Linux 2.2 -- copyfile() support?
> by PayPC System Mail Subscriber <spammail at quanta.paypc.com>
> 16) Permissions problem
> by "Dave Walton" <walton at emusic.com>
> 17) very confusing problem
> by Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE>
> 18) SWAT - should not touch "include=" Option
> by "Emrich Michael (QI/LBS3-Rt) *" <Michael.Emrich at de.bosch.com>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Date: 23 Feb 1999 03:23:43 +1000
>From: <MailAdmin at transport.qld.gov.au>
>To: samba at samba.org
>Subject: A message you sent has inappropriate language and has been blocked.
>Message-ID: <199902221734.DAA26076 at avalon>
>
>The message you sent with subject "SAMBA digest 1993" to
>david.m.cole at transport.qld.gov.au
>contains words or phrases which contravene QT/MR policy on
>the use of email, i.e. profanities or sexual references, and
>has therefore been blocked.
>
>Please edit and re-send. If you believe this was blocked in error
>please contact the Department of Transport Operations Management Centre
>on 07 3834 2095 for assistance DO NOT REPLY directly to this message as it is
>generated from an automated server.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 13:45:00 -0800
>From: RICK_ at t-online.de (JUERGEN ANZER)
>To: "Joseph P. Harbison" <jomedusa at apex.net>
>Subject: Re: samba question
>Message-ID: <36D07E5C.F7E at t-online.de>
>
>Joseph P. Harbison wrote:
>>
>> i don't know if you can help but i am having the same trouble you
>> posted...
>
>I¥ll try, but I¥m not a samba-expert too.
>
>> i can't browse my linux box...i see the machine but it is not
>> accessible....
>
>You cannot browse... but you can see? Where can you see the linux-box?
>In Search->Computer?
>
>ACCESS is done by <smbd>, whereas BROWSING is done by <nmbd>. What does
>your log.nmb and your log.smb say (located somewhere in ../var/..)?
>
>> i have read you post but don't understand
>> what you mean by changing the directory permissions...
>
>On my Unix-system, there was no r/w permission on
>/var/locks/browse.dat, so browsing failed...
>
>> i am using win98 with my linux box.....i don't log into the win98
>> machine....
>
>First let¥s make step by step:
>What version of Linux are you using?
>What version/distribution of samba are you using?
>What¥s in your smb.conf file?
>Are you using plaintext or encrypted passwords on your win9x clients?
>Have you increased the debug level in your smb.conf (log level=11 in
>your global section) and what does your log files say when
>browsing/accessing the shares?
>
>best regards
>rick
>
>--
>snail: ANZER GmbH - Pieperstr. 14 - 32791 Lage - Germany
>email: rick_ at t-online.de
>voice: (0049) 5232 / 9777-21
>fax: (0049) 5232 / 78094
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 12:45:04 -0600
>From: "Matthew Jamison" <xmj at cypress.com>
>To: <samba at samba.org>
>Subject: Problems With Configure Script On Solaris 2.6
>Message-ID: <002f01be5e93$760fc120$453d54c0 at melchizedek.Miss.Cypress.Com>
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>------=_NextPart_000_0030_01BE5E61.2B755120
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>I am having a Problem when I run the configure script in the source
>directory. I works for some time and then come back with the following
>error .
>
>ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe
>configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config
>
>Does any one have any suggestions on how I can fix this?
>
>Matthew
>
>--------------------------------------------
>Matthew Jamison xmj at cypress.com
>System Administrator Cypress Semiconductor
>601-324-4609 (CSDC)
>--------------------------------------------
>
>------=_NextPart_000_0030_01BE5E61.2B755120
>Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
> name="Matthew Jamison.vcf"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>Content-Disposition: attachment;
> filename="Matthew Jamison.vcf"
>
>BEGIN:VCARD
>VERSION:2.1
>N:Jamison;Matthew;;;
>FN:Matthew Jamison
>ORG:Cypress Semiconductor (CSDC);CSDC (cad)
>TITLE:Systems Administrator
>TEL;WORK;VOICE:(601) 324-4609
>TEL;WORK;FAX:(601) 324-4614
>ADR;WORK:;Starkville MS;1 Research Boulevard, Suite =
>200;Starkville;MS;39759-9740;United States of America
>LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=3DQUOTED-PRINTABLE:Starkville MS=3D0D=3D0A1 Research =
>Boulevard, Suite 200=3D0D=3D0AStarkville, MS 39759=3D
>-9740=3D0D=3D0AUnited States of America
>URL:
>URL:http://www.miss.cypress.com/~xmj
>ROLE:IT=20
>EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:xmj at cypress.com
>REV:19981202T094349Z
>END:VCARD
>
>------=_NextPart_000_0030_01BE5E61.2B755120--
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 14:00:51 -0500 (EST)
>From: Rob Naccarato <rob.naccarato at sheridanc.on.ca>
>To: samba at samba.anu.edu.au
>Subject: Case sensitive passwords in win95? Possible?
>Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9902221356080.27259-100000 at viking.sheridanc.on.ca>
>
>
>I'm finding a large amount of cpu time on my DU4.0D boxes when win95
>clients attempt a login. I'm guessing that the large percentage is due to
>crypting the password presented to Samba by the client for the many
>iterations defined by "password level" (mine's set to 8). I guess one way
>to reduce the load would be to configure win95 so that it does not
>uppercase the entire password, but send it in the case that the user typed
>it in in the first place. This way, I can set "password level" to 0.
>
>Anyone know of a way to do this, or is this wishful thinking?
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>Rob Naccarato "Civilized men are more discourteous than savages
>Sys Admin because they know they can be impolite without
>Sheridan College having their skulls split, as a general thing."
>Oakville, Ont. Canada - Robert E. Howard
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:43:14 -0500 (EST)
>From: James O'Kane <jo2y at jprc.com>
>To: "Eloy A. Paris" <eparis at ven.ra.rockwell.com>
>Subject: Re: Input/output error
>Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9902221529360.8962-100000 at thelia.jprc.com>
>
>This seems to work, but this is a less than ideal because the plain-text
>password gets written to disk as part of the shell history. Couldn't
>something be done with /etc/smbpasswd to do this?
>-james
>
>
>On Mon, 22 Feb 1999, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
>
>> It looks like your connection to your NT box has been closed after you
>> have been idle for too long. NT does this.
>>
>> If this is the case, you can solve the problem by supplying the password
>> to access the share in the smbmount command:
>>
>> smbmount //sol/internal_webpages password -U jo2y -W JPRC \
>> -c "mount /home/jo2y/mnt"
>>
>> peloy.-
>>
>> James O'Kane <jo2y at jprc.com> wrote:
>> > What could be wrong here?
>> >
>> >
>> > [jo2y at thelia jo2y]$ smbmount //sol/internal_webpages -U jo2y -W JPRC -c
>> > "mount /home/jo2y/mnt"
>> > Added interface ip=207.86.147.157 bcast=207.86.147.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
>> > Server time is Sun Feb 21 12:02:56 1999
>> > Timezone is UTC-5.0
>> > Password:
>> > Domain=[JPRC] OS=[Windows NT 4.0] Server=[NT LAN Manager 4.0]
>> > security=user
>> > [jo2y at thelia jo2y]$ df
>> > Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
>> > /dev/hda5 995115 593446 401669 60% /
>> > /dev/hda1 15522 5356 10166 35% /boot
>> > /dev/hda6 2920188 971542 1948646 33% /home
>> > //SOL/INTERNAL_WEBPAGES
>> > 1586560 990176 596384 62% /home/jo2y/mnt
>> >
>> > [...10 mins later...]
>> >
>> >
>> > [jo2y at thelia jo2y]$ cd mnt
>> > [jo2y at thelia mnt]$ ls
>> > ls: .: Input/output error
>> > [jo2y at thelia mnt]$ cd ..
>> > [jo2y at thelia ..]$ pwd
>> > /homes/jo2y/mnt/..
>> > [jo2y at thelia ..]$ cd ~
>> > [jo2y at thelia jo2y]$ smbumount mnt
>> > Could not open mnt: Input/output error
>> > [jo2y at thelia jo2y]$ smbumount /home/jo2y/mnt
>> > Could not open /home/jo2y/mnt: Input/output error
>> > [jo2y at thelia jo2y]$
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 13:46:17 -0700
>From: Joel <jwknight at cyberlink.bc.ca>
>To: samba at samba.org
>Subject: Large uptime
>Message-ID: <19990222134617.A2933 at cyberlink.bc.ca>
>
>Hello list.
>
>I admin a small network with a samba 1.9.18p10 server running under Linux
>2.0.34. The server processes domain logins, WINS requests and is the LMB.
>Everthing had been running very smooth for months then all of a sudden,
>none of the client (win 9x) machines could login; the error was "No server
>found to processes your domain logon." Further investigation proved that I
>could indeed ping the Linux box and I could even do a 'net view \\server'
>and get a list of all shares. A thorough investigation turned up nothing
>out of the ordinary save for the fact that when I restarted samba, it did
>*not* force an election. The log files show that it sets up the
>interfaces, etc, but thats where nmbd stops. I finally broke down and
>rebooted the server and nmbd forced the election and domain logons worked
>as always.
>
>Now, the only thing I can think of is that this server had been up for
>approx. 144 days. Are the problems we experienced somehow related to that?
>Perhaps a problem with the 2.0.34 kernel? I am interested to hear other
>people's stories running samba under Linux 2.0.x with long uptimes or from
>anyone who can shed some light on my mini-mystery.
>
>Thanks in advance :-)
>
>--
>
> Joel Knight jwknight at cyberlink.bc.ca
>
> PGP Key: hkp://keys.pgp.com/jwknight@cyberlink.bc.ca
> KeyID 2048/38C24864
> Fingerprint 6D7D 1E4F 728B ACDA 6557 F3EC 85BB BA7C 38C2 4864
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 16:03:46 -0500
>From: Greg.J.Pinto at trw.com (Greg J. Pinto)
>To: samba at samba.org
>Subject: Re: can't get in Network Neighborhood - need help
>Message-ID: <36D1C632.1A3F60CA at trw.com>
>
>I saw this message posted while I was catching up on previous digests.
>We've had similar problems with Samba machine showing up in the Network
>Browser. Some would, while others (running the same version and
>virtually identical smb.conf files) wouldn't. About a month ago I saw a
>post on here about the length of the Server Description tag in the
>smb.conf causing this problem. I shortened the length and a lo' and
>behold, the server was now appearing in the Browse lists on our Windoze
>hosts. Not sure if this was already relayed to you, but I didn't see it
>in subsequent digests.
>
>Greg
>
>> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 06:04:52 +0200 (EET)
>> From: Andrei
>> To: samba at samba.anu.edu.au
>> Subject: can't get in Network Neighborhood - need help
>> Message-ID:
>>
>>
>> I am currenlt using samba 2.0.2 but i remember having this problem
>> with older releases too. Everything works fine but no matter what i do
>> (user/share security level ; domain master=yes/no ;local master=yes/no
>> etc.) the windozes (win98) can see my samba server only if i do
>> start/find - computer. They can't see it in Network Neighborhood...
>>
>> Linux 2.2.1
>>
>> Thanx.
>>
>> ---
>> Andrei Postolache, and at lspvs.sorosis.ro, +40-35360249
>> An ideal world: no stupids, no 16800 bps connections and Windows works.
>>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 16:31:06 -0500
>From: Robert Seese <rseese at rrsinfo.com>
>To: "'samba at samba.org'" <samba at samba.org>
>Subject: FW: Samba Performance
>Message-ID: <F07E2BC09FE3D111A45900A0C9A94C93053433 at mail.rrsinfo.com>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Seese
>Sent: Monday, February 22, 1999 4:12 PM
>To: 'Jeremy Allison'
>Subject: RE: Samba Performance
>
>
>Sorry things are a little crazy around here. I forgot to add.
>
>We are running RH 5.2 and samba 2.0 I plan on upgrading to 2.02 this
>evening.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com]
>Sent: Monday, February 22, 1999 4:03 PM
>To: Pankaj Chowdhry
>Cc: Jeremy Allison; rseese at rrsinfo.com
>Subject: Re: Samba Performance
>
>
>Pankaj Chowdhry wrote:
>
>>
>> I am currently running samba 2.0 on a HP Netserver LH4 Xeon single
>> processor. I am having performance problems. Do you have any documentation
>> on the test environment and the performance tuning that you used in your
>> testing.
>> Thanks in advance
>> Robert Seese
>> RRS Police Records Management Inc.
>
>Hi Robert,
>
> Pankaj forwarded your message to me as I was the
>person who set up the VA Research Linux server for the
>PC Week benchmark.
>
>Could you elaborate a little more on your configuration
>and problems ?
>
>In addition, it may be advantagous to move the discussion
>to samba at samba.org or samba-technical at samba.org so more
>minds than mine can work on your problem :-).
>
>Regards,
>
> Jeremy Allison,
> Samba Team.
>
>--
>--------------------------------------------------------
>Buying an operating system without source is like buying
>a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
>--------------------------------------------------------
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 16:31:15 -0500
>From: Robert Seese <rseese at rrsinfo.com>
>To: "'samba at samba.org'" <samba at samba.org>
>Subject: FW: Samba Performance
>Message-ID: <F07E2BC09FE3D111A45900A0C9A94C93053434 at mail.rrsinfo.com>
>
>This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
>this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
>
>------_=_NextPart_000_01BE5EAA.AD2754C0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Seese
>Sent: Monday, February 22, 1999 4:10 PM
>To: 'Jeremy Allison'
>Subject: RE: Samba Performance
>
>
>I migrated 49 gig of image data to the server over the weekend.
>Unfortunately all of the performance testing I did was from one workstation.
>CPU utilization is at 98 to 100 percent at all times with 30 users
>connected.
>The server has 512 mb of ram 100mb intel nic
>HP netraid controler card with (8) 18gig drives in a raid 10 configuration
>and 2 mirrored 4 gig drives for the operating system.
>The filesystem performance is good 16 seconds to create a 100mb file "dd
>if=/dev/zero of=test.foo bs=1024 count =10000"
>
>ifconfig shows no collisions or any other sort of error.
>Please let me know if you see anything in the attached smb.conf file that
>might be a problem.
>Thanks!
>Robert Seese
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com]
>Sent: Monday, February 22, 1999 4:03 PM
>To: Pankaj Chowdhry
>Cc: Jeremy Allison; rseese at rrsinfo.com
>Subject: Re: Samba Performance
>
>
>Pankaj Chowdhry wrote:
>
>>
>> I am currently running samba 2.0 on a HP Netserver LH4 Xeon single
>> processor. I am having performance problems. Do you have any documentation
>> on the test environment and the performance tuning that you used in your
>> testing.
>> Thanks in advance
>> Robert Seese
>> RRS Police Records Management Inc.
>
>Hi Robert,
>
> Pankaj forwarded your message to me as I was the
>person who set up the VA Research Linux server for the
>PC Week benchmark.
>
>Could you elaborate a little more on your configuration
>and problems ?
>
>In addition, it may be advantagous to move the discussion
>to samba at samba.org or samba-technical at samba.org so more
>minds than mine can work on your problem :-).
>
>Regards,
>
> Jeremy Allison,
> Samba Team.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Uncle Ed's Rule of Thumb:
"Never use your thumb for a rule. You'll either hit it with a
hammer or get a splinter in it."
David B. Hazelton Voice: (617) 745-3817
Desktop Support Specialist Fax: (617) 745-3809
Information Technology Services
Eastern Nazarene College
More information about the samba
mailing list