sbragion.denis at usa.net
Tue Feb 23 10:03:21 GMT 1999
At 07.48 23/02/99 +1100, you wrote:
>Now, the only thing I can think of is that this server had been up for
>approx. 144 days. Are the problems we experienced somehow related to that?
>Perhaps a problem with the 2.0.34 kernel? I am interested to hear other
>people's stories running samba under Linux 2.0.x with long uptimes or from
>anyone who can shed some light on my mini-mystery.
never reched such a long uptime. Anyway I always had problems, even with
much shorter uptimes, whenever I used servers without ECC memory modules.
AFAIK 1 Mbit of DRAM (megabit *not* megabyte) looses about one bit a month
on the average. In my experience uptimes longer then a week on non ECC
system may be really dangerous.
Hope it helps.
Tel, Fax: +39 039 2324054
More information about the samba