SAMBA digest 1981
Thomas T. Veldhouse
veldy at visi.com
Sat Feb 13 00:04:20 GMT 1999
Please take me off of your mailing list. I have tried to remove myself via
your web interface. Now my username does not show up anymore, but I still
get this annoying digest.
Tom Veldhouse
veldy at visi.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba at samba.org [mailto:samba at samba.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 1999 8:30 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: SAMBA digest 1981
>
>
> SAMBA Digest 1981
>
> For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/
> Topics covered in this issue include:
>
> 1) Re: bcast to windows
> by "C. R. Oldham" <cro at nca.asu.edu>
> 2) Re: Re: file permissions
> by Guillermo <guillermo at castelo.org>
> 3) Re: CANNOT BROWSE (the solution)
> by RICK_ at t-online.de (JUERGEN ANZER)
> 4) Question
> by Toncho Dobrev <tony at soft-press.com>
> 5) Re: 'not listening for calling name' error (and RedHat stuff)
> by "Stephen L Arnold" <arnold.steve at ensco.com>
> 6) NT connection problems
> by "Ehlers, Chip" <Chip.Ehlers at hboc.com>
> 7) Print problem with Samba and AIX
> by Duncan Hill <dhill at sunbeach.net>
> 8) smbprint : illegal option
> by Francesc Guasch <frankie at etsetb.upc.es>
> 9) Re: I want Group Write on a Share
> by "Stephen L Arnold" <arnold.steve at ensco.com>
> 10) RE: CANNOT BROWSE (the solution)
> by Dave Lawson <DAVELA at menasco.com>
> 11) Too many files open - v1.9.17.p3
> by "Thomas G. Tri" <ttri at skees.com>
> 12) File system shows empty with DAVE 2.1
> by Adam Weisser <aweisser at kau1.kodak.com>
> 13) Re: bcast to windows
> by Panyarak Aaron Ngamsritragul <panya at me.psu.ac.th>
> 14) RedHat 5.2 intel Samba 2.0.2 binaries available.
> by Jeremy Allison <jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
> 15) accessing samba server that you dont have unix account on
> by "Lanny Baron" <beef at CyberTouch.ORG>
> 16) Problems witch samba instalation !!!
> by "Jorge Yuri de Lion Yaname" <jorgeyur at techno.com.br>
> 17) Problem with Samba caching file contents
> by "Frank Kettenbeil" <kettenbeil at danet.de>
> 18) samba through ppp ?
> by "Claudiu Balciza" <cbalciza at geocities.com>
> 19) Re: SAMBA digest 1980
> by Paul Sherwin <psherwin at telinco.co.uk>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 09:38:45 -0700
> From: "C. R. Oldham" <cro at nca.asu.edu>
> To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
> Subject: Re: bcast to windows
> Message-ID: <36C30795.5950E5EE at nca.asu.edu>
>
>
>
> Peter.Lingen at wrh.acab.alcatel.de wrote:
>
> > ************** try script like this works fine for me
> > HOSTS=`/usr/local/samba/bin/smbstatus -b | tail -n +5 | cut -c19-26`
> > for PC in $HOSTS
> > do
> > cat $1 | /usr/local/samba/bin/smbclient -M $PC
> > done
> > **************
> >
> > Peter Lingen
> > Tel.: +49 2166 27 2646
>
> Just out of curiosity is there any software out there that lets me go
> the other way? E.g. listen for messages and log them somewhere?
>
> --
> | Charles R. (C. R.) Oldham | NCA Commission on Schools |
> | cro at nca.asu.edu | Arizona St. Univ., PO Box 873011,|
> | V:602/965-8700 F:602/965-9423 | Tempe, AZ 85287-3011 _ |
> | "I like it!"--Citizen G'Kar | #include <disclaimer.h> X_>|
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 18:20:43 +0100
> From: Guillermo <guillermo at castelo.org>
> To: "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp at fgp.priv.at>, samba at samba.org
> Subject: Re: Re: file permissions
> Message-ID: <36C3116A.B23E0ADA at castelo.org>
>
> > > Is there any way to allow users write in a public directory shared
> > > with Samba and, at the same time, deny the removal of any file in the
> > > same directory. This users have not an account in the Linux
> side so they
> > > log as the guest user.
> > >
> > > I am using Red Hat Linux 5.2 and Samba 1.9.18p10.
> >
> > look at the permissions the /tmp directory has. I should have
> them set that
> > way, that users can create files, but only delete files they own.
>
> Thank you Florian Pflug but I am afraid I didn't explain the problem
> correctly. What I want is disallow user delete even files they own.
>
> We have an Acces database file in a public directory in the
> Samba Server.
> The users open this database through an interface program,
> obviusly the changes
> made need to be saved so we need write permission but not delete
> permission.
>
> At the same time we use the samba server to store some files that the
> interface program creates, this files can't be removed by his owner.
>
>
> Greetings, Guillermo
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:12:18 -0800
> From: RICK_ at t-online.de (JUERGEN ANZER)
> To: Dave Lawson <DAVELA at menasco.com>
> Subject: Re: CANNOT BROWSE (the solution)
> Message-ID: <36C37FF2.23E6 at t-online.de>
>
> Dave Lawson wrote:
> >
> > >
> > Here is log.nmb file:
> > 1999/02/03 19:15:34 netbios nameserver version 1.9.18p10 started
> > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1994-1997
> > 1999/02/03 19:15:35 becoming a daemon
> > Added interface ip=x.x.x.1 bcast=x.x.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0
> > Added interface ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.255.255.255 nmask=255.0.0.0
> > making subnet name:x.x.x.1 Broadcast address:x.x.255.255 Subnet
> > mask:255.255.0.0
> > making subnet name:127.0.0.1 Broadcast address:127.255.255.255 Subnet
> > mask:255.0.0.0
> > making subnet name:UNICAST_SUBNET Broadcast address:x.x.y.1 Subnet
> > mask:x.x.y.1
> > making subnet name:REMOTE_BROADCAST_SUBNET Broadcast
> address:0.0.0.0 Subnet
> > mask:0.0.0.0
> > register_name_timeout_response: WINS server at address x.x.y.1 is not
> > responding.
> > register_name_timeout_response: WINS server at address x.x.y.1 is not
> > responding.
> > register_name_timeout_response: WINS server at address x.x.y.1 is not
> > responding.
> > register_name_timeout_response: WINS server at address x.x.y.1 is not
> > responding.
> > etc...
> >
>
> WINS server not responding?! Have you got a WINS server? Something wrong
> with this WINS server - I guess ...
>
> > workgroup = NT_DOMAIN01
> > interfaces = x.x.x.1/16 localhost
> > guest account = pcguest
> > security = share
> > dead time = 1
> > socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192
> SO_RCVBUF=8192
> > local master = no
> > preferred master = no
> > wins support = no
>
> You don´t want WINS support? Have you tried to set this to YES?
>
> > domain master = no
> > os level = 0
> > wins server = x.x.y.1
>
> Here you entered your WINS server! Have you tried to uncomment this
> line?
>
> > dns proxy = no
> > wins proxy = no
>
>
> hope this helps
> best regards
> rick
>
> --
> snail: ANZER GmbH - Pieperstr. 14 - 32791 Lage - Germany
> email: rick_ at t-online.de
> voice: (0049) 5232 / 9777-21
> fax: (0049) 5232 / 78094
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 21:38:17 +0100
> From: Toncho Dobrev <tony at soft-press.com>
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: Question
> Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19990211213817.006b3e38 at soft-press.com>
>
> Hi dear friends
>
> I have Linux Slackware running Samba. I have two Ethernet networks
> connected by two LAN cards to Linux and PPP connection by leased
> line to my
> ISP. I have no file server on my LANs and I want Samba to be my
> file server
> and bridge between the Ethernets. In this moment I have routing between
> Ethernets, but the users from the first LAN cannot see the users
> from other
> LAN. I think I need to have configured Samba as WINS server or something
> else ?! Can somebody help me to configure Samba for this reason ?
>
> Sincerely yours
>
> Tonych
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> E-mail: tony at soft-press.com; tdobrev at usa.net
> ICQ UIN: 9091250
> GSM: ++359-(0)88-80 55 93
> Office Phone: ++359-(0)2-96 32 900; 65 79 97
>
> Toncho Dobrev
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 11:47:49 -0800
> From: "Stephen L Arnold" <arnold.steve at ensco.com>
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: Re: 'not listening for calling name' error (and RedHat stuff)
> Message-ID: <199902111942.OAA00734 at renown.cnchost.com>
>
> When the world was young, Paul Sherwin <psherwin at telinco.co.uk>
> carved some runes like this:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 10 David Taylor wrote:
> >
> > > I'm new to Samba and am having problems getting Samba V1.9.18p10
> > > (RedHat V5.2) to respond to a login request. It's got to be something
> > > simple that I've overlooked - it should work out of the box?
>
> The previous guy's post should fix it (the loopback address in
> hosts allow), but the RH52/samba 1.9.18p10 setup seemed to work
> pretty good for me out of the box (even changing to shadow and
> encrypted passwords worked fine with RH samba binaries). It took
> me a while to figure out named, nsswitch.conf, resolv.conf, etc.
> Also, if it seems to hang for 30 sec or so when you telnet to the
> RH box, try changing the entry in the hosts file for the windoze
> client (ie, if client.domain.org is the first name in /etc/hosts,
> change it to just "client" and use the former as the second name).
>
> > The bundled RedHat configurations definitely do _not_ work out
> of the box,
> > because of RH IP configuration idiocy. My RH5.0 system set itself up to
> > broadcast a request for a DNS server whenever it needed a
> hostname absent
> > from /etc/hosts. Of course, there _isn't_ a DNS server on my
> network (and
> > on most other SOHO nets I'd imagine) so large parts of TCP/IP broke,
> > including samba.
>
> That's because the default RedHat setup is to use named in a
> caching only configuration.
>
> > I fixed this by removing /etc/resolv.conf.
>
> You should probably edit nsswitch.conf instead (I have resolv.conf
> pointing to a local ISP DNS, but I hardly ever dial out from the
> linux box). Most of the time, our LAN is isolated from the outside
> world (except when people dial out from their windoze boxes).
>
> > The RH Samba setup doesn't seem to use keepalive packets either
> > - result, if you reboot your W95 system, Samba doesn't always
> > realise it and netbios name resolution screws up
> > (enabling the socket option SO_KEEPALIVE and adding
> > 'keep alive = 60' in smb.conf seemed to fix things for me).
>
> Don't know about that (I've never needed that particular setting).
> If NetBIOS name resolution is goofy, then you might want to try
> enabling WINS. Otherwise you need the same lmhosts file on every
> machine (that's my setup, only because the LAN guy is afraid of
> relying on linux for anything). I'd prefer to use WINS myself...
>
> > Getting a complex Samba setup to work can be a complete pain in the bum,
> > even if the basic configuration is correct. I suggest you start
> by trying
> > to share the /tmp directory with as much security disabled as possible.
> > When this works, get ready to learn about all the interesting methods of
> > password encryption M$ uses.
>
> I don't think the samba guys can be held responsible for arbitrary
> changes to M$ client behavior, broken network redirectors, etc. To
> my mind, windoze (all versions) is a *much* bigger kluge than samba
> over unix/linux. Your complaints seem to have more to do with a
> lack of understanding of how SMB relates to the underlying unix
> file permissions (and other windoze-unix interactions) more than
> anything else (as well as the fact that integrating a real OS
> (linux) with crap tends to expose the inherent problems existing in
> the crap side). That wasn't meant as a dig at you personally (but
> it kinda sounded like it eh? ;-) Getting all the linux services
> going (such as samba, named, squid, apache, networking stuff, etc)
> has been a real educational experience for me (it pretty much
> exposed my own serious ignorance too), but I've learned a *helluva*
> more useful stuff doing it than I ever did working with that other
> crap (sorry, but the word "crap" just springs to mind whenever I
> think of M$ products...).
>
> > Anybody who buys a RH distibution expecting not to do any Unix system
> > admin is in for a very nasty shock.
>
> Seriously, how can anyone expext to buy/install/setup/run a real OS
> like linux without doing any "Unix system admin" stuff? That's
> like expecting to buy a car and not learning how to drive. Sure
> it's a steeper learning curve than windoze, but you can actually
> *do* some serious (and very cool) stuff, rather than pull your hair
> out and reboot constantly. I'll admit that I feel like an idiot at
> first when I take on a new area of the system (what the hell is
> SQL?), but once I get stuff working I also feel a great sense of
> accomplishment. And now our PC/LAN guy comes to me for technical
> help... (he still thinks I'm nuts though)
>
> Sorry for the evangelism - would that be preaching to the choir?
>
> But you are right (in a way) about RedHat. They seem to want to do
> things just a little bit different than other distributions (their
> samba configuration is definitely non-stock). Seemingly arbitrary
> RedHat changes have bitten me in the ass many times. That said,
> I've always come back to them after trying others (eg, slackware,
> debian, etc). I guess I'm a bit masochistic (I *did* marry a fiery
> latina after all ;-)
>
> Steve (hey, at least I didn't post the entire digest, or a bunch of
> html crap)
>
>
> ************************************************************
> Stephen L. Arnold arnold.steve at ensco.com
>
> Linux: It's not just for nerds anymore...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 14:41:25 -0500
> From: "Ehlers, Chip" <Chip.Ehlers at hboc.com>
> To: "'samba at samba.anu.edu.au'" <samba at samba.anu.edu.au>
> Subject: NT connection problems
> Message-ID:
> <914453F9973BD211A51900805FE6FB150B0238 at cltexc01ntms.cpg.hboc.com>
>
>
>
> Chip Ehlers
> McKessonHBOC
> Network Advisor
> Office - 704 549-6781
> Internal 122,6781
> Fax - 704 548-7748
> chip.ehlers at hboc.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 15:10:22 -0500 (EST)
> From: Duncan Hill <dhill at sunbeach.net>
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: Print problem with Samba and AIX
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9902111501220.20298-100000 at bajan.pct.edu>
>
> My apologies if this is an RTFM question, but I find no mention of it
> anywhere.
>
> I have an HP LJ4M+ sitting on the bacl of an AIX 4.3.1 box. There is
> one NT workstation using the shared printer to print files from Adobe
> via the postscript interface of the HP.
>
> Yesterday, a 500 page job was submitted to the queue. It never
> printed. My logs showed it spooled, but nothing happened. Today, a
> 127 page job was submitted. 15 pages printed and it stopped. I have
> never seen a printer do this before, and it is driving my boss crazy
> (she has to spool 10 pages at a time, and one of the documents is 3000
> pages).
>
> I have tried a custom lpr command that tells the queue to leave the
> file on disk until it is fully printed, but that hasn't helped.
>
> I am not sure if this is an AIX bug, HP bug or Samba bug, so I'm
> trying to eliminate at least one part of the equation.
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
> --
>
> Duncan Hill Penn College Proud - www.pct.edu
> One net to rule them all, One net to find them,
> One net to bring them all, and using Unix bind them.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 21:47:40 +0100
> From: Francesc Guasch <frankie at etsetb.upc.es>
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: smbprint : illegal option
> Message-ID: <36C341EC.FF5E060A at etsetb.upc.es>
>
> Hi. I try to print using smbprint. It doesn't work, checking the
> log I found :
>
> /usr/local/etc/smbprint: illegal option -- C
> /usr/local/etc/smbprint: illegal option -- A
> /usr/local/etc/smbprint: illegal option -- F
> /usr/local/etc/smbprint: illegal option -- f
> /usr/local/etc/smbprint: illegal option -- H
> /usr/local/etc/smbprint: illegal option -- p
> /usr/local/etc/smbprint: illegal option -- a
> /usr/local/etc/smbprint: illegal option -- r
> /usr/local/etc/smbprint: illegal option -- r
> /usr/local/etc/smbprint: illegal option -- a
> ...
> and follows
> it looks like it's the name of the server and then
> (sdin) ...
>
> I'm using solaris 2.6. I had to use bash instead of sh because
> my sh didn't seemed to handle well \${$#} but now I'm suck
> here.
> I searched the archives but found nothing about this.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 13:38:09 -0800
> From: "Stephen L Arnold" <arnold.steve at ensco.com>
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: Re: I want Group Write on a Share
> Message-ID: <199902112132.QAA24196 at illustrious.cnchost.com>
>
> When the world was young, Eric_Songer at urscorp.com carved some runes
> like this:
>
> > Ultra Sparc using Solaris 2.5.1. When Win95/NT clients create files or
> > folders on a share, the protections are set so only the user has write
> > access. I want Group write access.
>
> Then the group (that the desired users belong to under Solaris)
> must own the directory tree that you're exporting as a samba share
> (make sure it's not owned by root). Depending on whether or not
> you set the sticky bit on the directory, you can have group
> read/write access, or group write (where only the file owner can
> modify).
>
> > I did RTFM, and tried to set create mask (or mode, I tried both) in
> > the smb.conf, but in my log file I get the following error: Ignoring
> > badly formed line: create mask 0775. I then tried force create
> mask, etc,
> > but I always get the same badly formed line error. Will somebody please
> > tell me what I'm doing wrong?
>
> You forgot the equals sign (as in "create mode = 0775). Feel like
> Homer yet? (Doh! :-p)
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:09:19 -0500
> From: Dave Lawson <DAVELA at menasco.com>
> To: "'0523297770 at t-online.de'" <0523297770 at t-online.de>
> Cc: "'samba at samba.org'" <samba at samba.org>
> Subject: RE: CANNOT BROWSE (the solution)
> Message-ID: <5423E9E4E7B9D011B6A2080009DB786E0110373F at COMMUNICATION>
>
> > Dave Lawson wrote:
> > >
> >> Here is log.nmb file:
> > >> 1999/02/03 19:15:34 netbios nameserver version 1.9.18p10 started
> > >> Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1994-1997
> >> 1999/02/03 19:15:35 becoming a daemon
> >> Added interface ip=x.x.x.1 bcast=x.x.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0
> >> Added interface ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.255.255.255 nmask=255.0.0.0
> >> making subnet name:x.x.x.1 Broadcast address:x.x.255.255 Subnet
> >> mask:255.255.0.0
> > > making subnet name:127.0.0.1 Broadcast address:127.255.255.255 Subnet
> >> mask:255.0.0.0
> >> making subnet name:UNICAST_SUBNET Broadcast address:x.x.y.1 Subnet
> >> mask:x.x.y.1
> >> making subnet name:REMOTE_BROADCAST_SUBNET Broadcast address:0.0.0.0
> Subnet
> >> mask:0.0.0.0
> >> register_name_timeout_response: WINS server at address x.x.y.1 is not
> >> responding.
> >> register_name_timeout_response: WINS server at address x.x.y.1 is not
> >> responding.
> >> register_name_timeout_response: WINS server at address x.x.y.1 is not
> >> responding.
> >> etc...
>
> > WINS server not responding?! Have you got a WINS server? Something wrong
> > with this WINS server - I guess ...
>
> Thanks for your continued interest in this browsing problem. Yes we really
> do have a NT wins server (although its not in my juristiction)
> and I've got
> the right IP for it. Something wrong with WINS server? Definitely a
> convenient place to blame.
>
> >> workgroup = NT_DOMAIN01
> >> interfaces = x.x.x.1/16 localhost
> >> guest account = pcguest
> >> security = share
> >> dead time = 1
> >> socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192
> SO_RCVBUF=8192
> >> local master = no
> >> preferred master = no
> >> wins support = no
>
> >You don´t want WINS support? Have you tried to set this to YES?
>
> Here is a snip from the smb.conf man page.
>
> wins support (G)
> This boolean controls if Samba will act as a WINS server. You
> should not set
> this to true unless you have a multi-subnetted network and you wish a
> particular nmbd to be your WINS server. Note that you should *NEVER* set
> this to true on more than one machine in your network.
>
> The way I read this, there should not be more than one WINS server on a
> subnet, so I think I'll keep my setting to "no". Did I read this wrong?
>
> >> domain master = no
> >> os level = 0
> >> wins server = x.x.y.1
>
> >Here you entered your WINS server! Have you tried to uncomment this
> >line?
>
> yes. wins server was always uncommented. smb.conf says the following:
>
> wins server (G)
> This specifies the DNS name (or IP address) of the WINS server that Samba
> should register with. If you have a WINS server on your network then you
> should set this to the WINS servers name.
>
> >> dns proxy = no
> > >> wins proxy = no
> >
> >hope this helps
> >best regards
> >rick
>
> we'll lic this thing somehow i hope
>
> Regards, Dave
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:09:17 -0500
> From: "Thomas G. Tri" <ttri at skees.com>
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: Too many files open - v1.9.17.p3
> Message-ID: <4.1.19990211164834.00a34f10 at mercury.skees.com>
>
> <html>
> I am running v1.9.17.p3 on a Solaris 2.6 Ultra 2.<br>
> <br>
> When running an accounting application developed in FoxPro, that appears
> to open a large number of files, I get errors in the application about
> missing files, etc. that I know are on the SAMBA share. I can log
> in to the Sun box and see that all permissions, etc. are correct.<br>
> <br>
> To track it down, I set the debug level = 3 in smb.conf. Attached
> is a snippet of the log file that seems to indicate that when the number
> of file handles approaches 100 (84 or 85 in this case), SAMBA does not
> open any more handles. Therefore is probably passing "could
> not open message" back to the FoxPro application, which is giving
> the errors described above. Note the text error opening with the
> "too many files open" message.<br>
> <br>
> Is this a config issue with v1.9.17.p3?? In reading some of the technical
> mailing list archives, it seems that this is a parameter (MAX_OPEN_FILES)
> that was added for v2.0.0?? By default set at 10,000?? It
> appears that it was a compile time option in the earlier versions.
> Will v2.0.0 correct my problem?? Am I on the right track??<br>
> <br>
> My question: If the above assumptions are all true, and this is an
> indicator of this problem, my alternatives are to recompile my current
> version or upgrade to v2.0.0? Correct?<br>
> <br>
> Thanks again for a great product.<br>
> <br>
> log file snippet:<br>
> ---------------<br>
> switch message SMBopenX (pid 29669)<br>
> unix_clean_name [./S480/data/sj.FPT]<br>
> unix_clean_name [s480/data/sj.fpt]<br>
> Allocated new file_fd_struct 93, dev = ffffffff, inode = ffffffff<br>
> Error opening file s480/data/sj.fpt (<font size=4><b>Too many open
> files</font></b>) (flags=2)<br>
> fd_attempt_close on file_fd_struct 93, fd = -1, dev = ffffffff, inode =
> ffffffff, open_flags = 2, ref_count = 1.<br>
> 02/11/99 09:07:29 error packet at line 1228 cmd=45 (SMBopenX) eclass=1
> ecode=5<br>
> 02/11/99 09:07:29 Transaction 1289409 of length 46<br>
> switch message SMBclose (pid 29669)<br>
> del_share_modes (FAST_SHARE_MODES): Deleting share mode entry dev =
> 8388885, inode = 81537 in hash bucket 44 (num entries now = 0)<br>
> del_share_modes (FAST_SHARE_MODES): num entries = 0, deleting share_mode
> record dev = 8388885, inode = 81537 in hash bucket 44<br>
> fd_attempt_close on file_fd_struct 92, fd = 99, dev = 800115, inode =
> 13e81, open_flags = 2, ref_count = 1.<br>
> 02/11/99 09:07:29 ttri closed file s480/data/sj.dbf
> (<b>numopen=84</b>)<br>
> --------------------------<br>
> end snippet<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <div>Thomas G. Tri (ttri at skees.com)</div>
> <div>Skees Engineering, Inc.</div>
> <div>4229 Bardstown Rd., Suite 314</div>
> <div>Louisville, KY 40218</div>
> <div>502.499.0358</div>
> Fax 499.1659
> </html>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:15:49 +1100
> From: Adam Weisser <aweisser at kau1.kodak.com>
> To: Samba Mailing List <samba at samba.org>
> Subject: File system shows empty with DAVE 2.1
> Message-ID: <36C364A5.7BFB8FDA at kodak.com.au>
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --------------0F9B85FF29CE5074288E7786
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Hi all.
>
> When I try to mount a file system on a Mac running DAVE 2.1 as OS 8.5,
> the file system's mount fine, but shows up empty on the desktop.
>
> I've attached the log output (debug level 5).
>
> Any help is appreciated!
>
> Adam
>
> --
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Adam Weisser aweisser at kodak.com.au
> CI Digital Imaging Products & Services ph: +61 3 9353 3923
> Kodak Australia fax: +61 3 9353 3940
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------0F9B85FF29CE5074288E7786
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
> name="samba.log"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline;
> filename="samba.log"
>
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(565)
> Transaction 17 of length 91
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(459)
> size=87
> smb_com=0x32
> smb_rcls=0
> smb_reh=0
> smb_err=0
> smb_flg=0
> smb_flg2=3
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(465)
> smb_tid=2
> smb_pid=55961
> smb_uid=100
> smb_mid=60928
> smt_wct=15
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[0]=21 (0x15)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[2]=10 (0xA)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[3]=4096 (0x1000)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[9]=21 (0x15)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[10]=66 (0x42)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[13]=1 (0x1)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[14]=1 (0x1)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(475)
> smb_bcc=22
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(402)
> switch message SMBtrans2 (pid 2576)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(209)
> Skipping become_user - already user
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 3] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2findfirst(664)
> call_trans2findfirst: dirtype = 22, maxentries = 1,
> close_after_first=0, close_if_end = 0 requires_resume_key = 0
> level = 770, max_data_bytes = 4096
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138)
> error packet at line 678 cmd=50 (SMBtrans2) eclass=1 ecode=124
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(459)
> size=35
> smb_com=0x32
> smb_rcls=1
> smb_reh=0
> smb_err=124
> smb_flg=128
> smb_flg2=65
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(465)
> smb_tid=2
> smb_pid=55961
> smb_uid=100
> smb_mid=60928
> smt_wct=0
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(475)
> smb_bcc=0
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(565)
> Transaction 18 of length 85
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(459)
> size=81
> smb_com=0x32
> smb_rcls=0
> smb_reh=0
> smb_err=0
> smb_flg=0
> smb_flg2=3
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(465)
> smb_tid=2
> smb_pid=55961
> smb_uid=100
> smb_mid=61440
> smt_wct=15
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[0]=15 (0xF)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[2]=10 (0xA)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[3]=4096 (0x1000)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[9]=15 (0xF)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[10]=66 (0x42)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[13]=1 (0x1)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(470)
> smb_vwv[14]=1 (0x1)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(475)
> smb_bcc=16
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(402)
> switch message SMBtrans2 (pid 2576)
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(209)
> Skipping become_user - already user
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 3] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2findfirst(664)
> call_trans2findfirst: dirtype = 22, maxentries = 11,
> close_after_first=0, close_if_end = 0 requires_resume_key = 0
> level = 770, max_data_bytes = 4096
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138)
> error packet at line 678 cmd=50 (SMBtrans2) eclass=1 ecode=124
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(459)
> size=35
> smb_com=0x32
> smb_rcls=1
> smb_reh=0
> smb_err=124
> smb_flg=128
> smb_flg2=65
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(465)
> smb_tid=2
> smb_pid=55961
> smb_uid=100
> smb_mid=61440
> smt_wct=0
> [1999/02/12 09:56:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(475)
> smb_bcc=0
>
> --------------0F9B85FF29CE5074288E7786--
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 07:45:35 -0700 (GMT+7)
> From: Panyarak Aaron Ngamsritragul <panya at me.psu.ac.th>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <samba at samba.org>
> Subject: Re: bcast to windows
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990212073937.6235A-100000 at me-serv.me.psu.ac.th>
>
>
> I am using old version of samba, i.e. 1.9.18p8 in RH 5.1
> with a few windoz clients...
>
> I have tried the 'smbclient -M client', but the message
> just went away somewhere. It never appear on any machine
> I have tried. What is the root cause of this problem ?
> Do I have to set any thing in windoz clients ?
>
> Thanks for your advice.
> Panyarak
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:41:34 -0800
> From: Jeremy Allison <jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
> To: "samba at samba.anu.edu.au" <samba at samba.anu.edu.au>, Samba
> Binaries <samba-binaries at samba.anu.edu.au>, jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
> Subject: RedHat 5.2 intel Samba 2.0.2 binaries available.
> Message-ID: <36C386CE.55B47933 at engr.sgi.com>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have created Samba 2.0.2 RedHat 5.2 intel RPM's to be
> found at :
>
> samba.org/samba/ftp/bin-pkgs/redhat/RPMS/5.2/
>
> In line with JohnT's new numbering scheme for
> rpm binaries, the 2.0.2 binary release version
> is the date on which it was prepared, eg.
>
> samba-2.0.2-19990209.i386.rpm
>
> Source rpm's are also availble.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Jeremy Allison,
> Samba Team.
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Buying an operating system without source is like buying
> a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 00:09:58 -0500
> From: "Lanny Baron" <beef at CyberTouch.ORG>
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: accessing samba server that you dont have unix account on
> Message-ID: <199902120512.AAA09866 at freedom.cybertouch.org>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am one of the mirrors for samba. But i need a little help. I have 2
> servers here and on freedom2 i have samba installed but i took out
> my personal account for various reasons.
>
> Question; How can i access dirs from my win box? They are not
> going to be guest accounts for sure. In smb.conf in the place where
> you put the shares, what do you put there for a user that does not
> have an account but you want valid users for both viewing and
> writing.
>
> Question: I have MS Office. Is there a way to make it such that
> when someone writes a doc or spreadsheet the file is set to 700?
>
> Thanks alot for your help
> Lanny Baron
> http://ca.samba.org/samba/samba.html
> http://samba.cybertouch.org
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 08:09:12 -0200
> From: "Jorge Yuri de Lion Yaname" <jorgeyur at techno.com.br>
> To: samba-technical at samba.org, samba at samba.org, Lista - Samba
> <listproc at samba.anu.edu.au>
> Subject: Problems witch samba instalation !!!
> Message-ID: <36C3FDC8.5AE9337E at techno.com.br>
>
> I'm from Brazil. I'm sorry, but my english is more less. When gone
> install
> the Samba, in my HP-UX 10.20, of the error, after of "./configure":
>
> checking configure sumary
> ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe
> configure: error: summary failue. Aborting config.
>
> Waiting the answer,
>
> Jorge Yuri de Lion Yamane - Bauru - Brazil
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 13:21:23 +0100
> From: "Frank Kettenbeil" <kettenbeil at danet.de>
> To: samba at samba.org
> Subject: Problem with Samba caching file contents
> Message-ID: <9902121223.AA26335 at belenus.tt.danet.de>
>
> Hello everybody,
> We are using Samba 2.02 on Sun Solaris 2.51 and 2.6 platforms.
> Using these as a file server we occasionally have the following
> problem:
> - the file is changed on the file server using standard UNIX tools
> while somebody else is editing it
> - the other user re-loads the file using a Windows 95 client
> - the content of the file seems to be the same as before the change
> on the windows client, but is definitively not, if you look at the
> server side
>
> This implies to me, that there must be some kind of caching
> algorithm implemented in samba, that does not cover the server-
> side changes of files - or at least sometimes misses them.
>
> - how can I disable this cache?
> - we are using Ultraedit on the clients for editing files - is there any
> known issue maybe using this tool or Windows 95 itself ?
> - any other ideas, that could help?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Frank Kettenbeil
> Mit freundlichen Gruessen
> Frank Kettenbeil
>
> Danet GmbH
> Geschaeftsstelle Telekommunikationstechnologie (TT)
> Telefon: 06151 868-190 Fax: 06151 868-264
> Email: kettenbeil at danet.de
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 14:48:49 +0200
> From: "Claudiu Balciza" <cbalciza at geocities.com>
> To: <samba at samba.org>
> Subject: samba through ppp ?
> Message-ID: <199902121332.FAA21838 at geocities.com>
>
> I have samba 2.0.2 on Linux/kernel2.2.1
> I also have a dial-in server on that machine.
> I would like to allow clients to access samba shares through ppp.
> How ca I do that ?
>
> Claudiu
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 14:26:43 +0000
> From: Paul Sherwin <psherwin at telinco.co.uk>
> To: samba at samba.org
> Cc: darylb at pobox.com
> Subject: Re: SAMBA digest 1980
> Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19990212142643.0079d720 at mail.telinco.co.uk>
>
> At 03:39 12/02/99 +1100, you wrote:
> >
> >From: "Daryl L. Biberdorf" <darylb at pobox.com>
> >
> >We're having an interesting problem at our
> >site.
> [snip]
> >I'm wondering if an outage between
> >us and the DNS would result in this kind of failure.
>
> Linux sockets seem to react badly to DNS problems - an inability
> to resolve
> a name causes the socket opening to hang for about 2 minutes before
> continuing. I haven't worked out why this is yet - I just disabled DNS
> resolution altogether (my system isn't part of the 'real' internet). If
> your DNS is screwed up lots of TCP/IP stuff will break as well as Samba. A
> good test is to telnet to the Linux box from a computer that isn't in the
> hosts file - if the connection attempt hangs for a couple of
> minutes before
> giving you a login prompt, DNS is stuffed. smbclient -L SERVERNAME will
> also (probably) hang, while smbclient -L SERVER-IP-ADDRESS will work
> correctly.
>
> I also had unrelated but superficially similar problems with keepalive
> packets - these weren't being sent by default so when a workstation
> rebooted Samba didn't always see it and netbios name resolution broke. If
> this happens you'll be able to see the server (sometimes) but not its
> shares (sometimes). Enable 'socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE' and 'keep alive
> = 60' in smb.conf to fix this.
>
> If you figure out a way to make Linux time out faster when DNS is broken
> I'd appreciate an email!
>
> Best regards, Paul
>
>
> Paul Sherwin Consulting
> 22 Monmouth Road, Oxford OX1 4TD, UK
> Phone +44 (0)1865 721438
> Fax +44 (0)1865 434331
> Pager +44 (0)7666 797228
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of SAMBA Digest 1981
> ************************
>
More information about the samba
mailing list