remove

Petr Sedláček petr.sedlacek at brno.comp.cz
Mon Oct 12 19:49:59 GMT 1998


remove
-----Původní zpráva-----
Od: samba at samba.anu.edu.au <samba at samba.anu.edu.au>
Komu: Multiple recipients of list <samba at samba.anu.edu.au>
Datum: 12. října 1998 18:14
Předmět: SAMBA digest 1841


>     SAMBA Digest 1841
>
>For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc
>Topics covered in this issue include:
>
>  1) Rule: Re: SAMBA digest 1840
> by "David McKay" <mckayd at sog.com.au>
>  2) Passwords
> by "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp at fgp.priv.at>
>  3) RE: SAMBA digest 1840
> by waine at prism-dm.co.uk
>  4) Lots of smbd -D when doing 'ps ax'
> by "Philip Tong" <ptmc at pd.jaring.my>
>  5) Re: SAMBA digest 1837
> by Henrik Ejderholm <he at sectra.se>
>  6) smbpasswd (error code 131)
> by "Jaap van Milgen" <jaap at st-gilles.rennes.inra.fr>
>  7) Re: fallback password mechanism ?
> by Stefan Rompf <srompf at telemation.de>
>  8) Re: win98 vs win95 with TCP/IP
> by Sbragion Denis <infotecn at tin.it>
>  9) Re: W98
> by "Oleg Kustov" <O.Kustov at snoras.com>
> 10) Re: Lots of smbd -D when doing 'ps ax'
> by James Thompson <jamest at math.ksu.edu>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 11 Oct 98 22:53:14 +0800
>From: "David McKay" <mckayd at sog.com.au>
>To: <samba at samba.anu.edu.au>
>Subject: Rule: Re: SAMBA digest 1840
>Message-ID: <9810119081.AA908117903 at ccmail.sog.com.au>
>
>
>     I am annual leave until October 28th please contact Nelson Contreras
>     (551) or Brandon Tran (654) during this period.
>
>     Kind Regards
>
>
>     David McKay
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 17:02:57 +0200
>From: "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp at fgp.priv.at>
>To: samba at samba.anu.edu.au
>Subject: Passwords
>Message-ID: <19981011170257.A1346 at fgp.priv.at>
>
>Hi
>
>I'm trying to introduce samba at my school, but I'm having problems.
>I user samba-1.9.18p10, with Debian 1.3.1
>We have some WfW 3.11 clients.
>The following happens:
>) The clients can't connect as a user that hast "" (nothing) as password.
> This also happend with smbclient as client
>) User whos password is longer then 8 characters can't connect with
>smbclient, if the type in more then 8 characters at the password prompt. If
>they type only the first 8 charactes, then can connect without a problem.
>
>We don't user encrypted password (I guess WfW 3.11 doesn't support them).
>
>It looks as if the password-comparing code in 1.9.18p10 is broken - but of
>course I can be wrong.
>
>                                               Greetings from Vienna
>
>                                                  Florian Pflug
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 23:22:16 +0100
>From: waine at prism-dm.co.uk
>To: samba at samba.anu.edu.au
>Subject: RE: SAMBA digest 1840
>Message-ID: <MDAEMON110011199810112322.AA2215098 at prism-dm.co.uk>
>
>Dear samba at samba.anu.edu.au,
>
>Thanks for your recent message regarding `SAMBA digest 1840`.
>
>I am out of the office until 14th October 1998.
>
>You can contact me after that date.
>
>Thanks again!
>
>waine at prism-dm.co.uk
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 14:48:23 +0800
>From: "Philip Tong" <ptmc at pd.jaring.my>
>To: <samba at samba.anu.edu.au>
>Subject: Lots of smbd -D when doing 'ps ax'
>Message-ID: <199810120637.OAA24790 at relay14.jaring.my>
>
>Initially when the system is booted up, there is only one smbd & 1 nmbd.
>
>After awhile, there seems to be many instances of 'smbd -D' around when I
do
>a 'ps ax'.
>
>Is it normal to have so many instances of smbd running?
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 08:33:36 +0200
>From: Henrik Ejderholm <he at sectra.se>
>To: samba at samba.anu.edu.au
>Subject: Re: SAMBA digest 1837
>Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19981012083336.00a0e720 at desmond.sectra.se>
>
>>Multiple nmbd's:
>>We are unable to start two nmbd's on separate interfaces to service name
>>requests on the same server (for cluster failure) - error from second nmbd
>>log follows:
>>(Using the '-n' switch and specifying separate smb.conf's and logs)
>>
>>--------<output>--------
>>bind failed on port 137 socket_addr=0.0.0.0 (Address already in use)
>>--------<output>--------
>>
>>
>>
>>Our Platform Details:
>>Samba Version = 1.9.18p10
>>OS = IBM AIX 4.2.1
>>Compiler = IBM C for AIX Version 4.3
>>
>>
>
>Use the "socket address = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" in smb.conf to setup which
>address to do the binding to. Also use "interfaces =
>xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" for a specific interface. I've done this
>in both HP-UX and Solaris HA environment and it works fine.
>
>Regards,
>
>Henrik
>Henrik Ejderholm Phone: + 46 13 23 52 00
>Sectra-Imtec AB Telefax: + 46 13 21 21 85
>Teknikringen 2 Internet: he at sectra.se
>583 30 Linköping WWW: http://www.sectra.se
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 10:24:18 +0200
>From: "Jaap van Milgen" <jaap at st-gilles.rennes.inra.fr>
>To: "samba at arvidsjaur. anu. edu. au" <samba at arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
>Subject: smbpasswd (error code 131)
>Message-ID: <000501bdf5b9$b4a4dc60$b58d5dc0 at jaap.rennes.inra.fr>
>
>I'm trying to migrate to a system with encrypted passwords, but I have a
>problem with smbpasswd.  When I try to modify an encrypted passwd (either
NO
>PASSWORD or a valid one) on unix, smbpasswd returns the following message:
>
>smbpasswd: machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the session request. Error was : code
>131.
>
>Anyone any ideas?
>Jaap van Milgen
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 22:19:43 +0100
>From: Stefan Rompf <srompf at telemation.de>
>To: samba at samba.anu.edu.au
>Cc: Herbert Rosmanith <herp at wildsau.idv-edu.uni-linz.ac.at>
>Subject: Re: fallback password mechanism ?
>Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19981011221943.00697f78 at telesun2.telemation.de>
>
>Quoting Herbert Rosmanith:
>
>>If a non-encrypted password is received from smbd, and it cannot find
>>it in the samba-password, it could try to find it in /etc/passwd,
>>like it did before without "encrypted passwords". this way, this would
>>save us to contact every user ( ~ 200 people) and tell them their
>>new standard password or assign a new password.
>
>There is an option, I think it is called "update encrypted" that allows
>smbd to add the encrypted password to the smbpasswd file when it is not
>there and the user logs in. This should solve your problem.
>
>cu.. Stefan
>
> +--------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Customer: I'm using Windows '95.  Hotline: Ok, got that one. |
> | Customer: It's not working.  Hotline: You already said that. |
> +--------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 08:40:56 +0200
>From: Sbragion Denis <infotecn at tin.it>
>To: samba at samba.anu.edu.au
>Cc: hugh.nelson at ausinfo.com.au
>Subject: Re: win98 vs win95 with TCP/IP
>Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19981012084056.00b46770 at MBox.InfoTecna.com>
>
>Hello,
>
>>I have been disappointed that I can't use Linux+Samba as an
>>alternative to a Win9x or NT server for our GP medical practice.
>..
>>Is it possible that Win98 does TCP/IP properly and might be faster
>>than win95 as a tcp/ip workstation client??
>
>im my experience Win98 isn't any faster than Win95 and sometimes is even
>slower. Also in my experience correctly configured Samba Servers working
>with Win95/98 aren't any slower than NT Servers as long as TCP/IP is used.
>Samba is only a little slower than Novell.
>
>Hope it helps.
>
> Dr. Sbragion Denis
> InfoTecna
> Tel, Fax: +39 039 2324054
> URL: http://space.tin.it/internet/dsbragio
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 14:37:12 +0200
>From: "Oleg Kustov" <O.Kustov at snoras.com>
>To: <samba at samba.anu.edu.au>
>Subject: Re: W98
>Message-ID: <19981012124217Z12670674-20449+16684 at samba.anu.edu.au>
>
>>> I have installed Samba 1.9.17p4 on Linux server.
>>> PC with Windows95 and Windows NT( with registery set to >enable plain
>text
>>> password) are connected without any problem.
>>> But PC with Windows98 are not.
>>>
>
>Hi!
>Thanks for replay.
>
>>With win98, you are better off with the latest release and better off
using
>>"smbpasswd".
>>I don't think the registry hack for win98 is common knowledge as yet.
>>So, I let samba support encrupted passwords (which means you need to
>>use smbpassword).   There is tons of documentation on that with the
>>distribution.
>>
>>Its quite straightforward and it took me an hour to get the setup going.
>
>We have work places with W95 as well.
>If You let samba support encrupted passwords You can't connect to samba
>shares from W95!
>I at last solve the problem by Windows registry! And it is different in WNT
>and W98.
>
>Best regards, Oleg
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 08:01:37 -0500 (CDT)
>From: James Thompson <jamest at math.ksu.edu>
>To: Philip Tong <ptmc at pd.jaring.my>
>Subject: Re: Lots of smbd -D when doing 'ps ax'
>Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.981012075728.16905A-100000 at euler.math.ksu.edu>
>
>On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Philip Tong wrote:
>
>> Initially when the system is booted up, there is only one smbd & 1 nmbd.
>>
>> After awhile, there seems to be many instances of 'smbd -D' around when I
do
>> a 'ps ax'.
>>
>> Is it normal to have so many instances of smbd running?
>>
>
>Yes.  My understanding is that the main smbd spawns a new copies of itself
>to handle each client that requests services.  If you use smbstatus it
>will tell you the users connected as well as the process IDs of the smbd
>that is handling the requests.
>
>Hope this help
>
>->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->---<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<
>James Thompson    138 Cardwell Hall  Manhattan, Ks   66506    785-532-0561
>Kansas State University                          Department of Mathematics
>->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->---<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of SAMBA Digest 1841
>************************



More information about the samba mailing list