oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down
Robert Dahlem
Robert.Dahlem at frankfurt.netsurf.de
Sat Dec 19 09:18:29 GMT 1998
Bruce,
On Sat, 19 Dec 1998 18:14:42 +1100, Bruce Tenison wrote:
>> Are oplocks needed on that share? Have you tried turning them
>> off? If you're simply running the F-SECURE program from there, you
>> shouldn't need oplocks.
>>
>I'm pretty sure that they're needed, since the clients don't actually run
>the software from there, but they use the share to check for updates to
>the AV files, and report back to the Administration station via the share
>on any located viruses. Works really nice, when it works ;)
>
>Maybe I'm misunderstanding the purpose of oplocks?!?!?
Yes. Opportunistic locks (oplocks) allow the client to agressively cache file
contents local. When having "oplocks = false" they just dont cache file contents.
It has nothing to do with record locking.
Hasta la vista,
Robert
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Robert.Dahlem at frankfurt.netsurf.de
Radio Bornheim - 2:2461/332 at fidonet +49-69-4930830 (ZyX, V34)
2:2461/326 at fidonet +49-69-94414444 (ISDN X.75)
---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the samba
mailing list