File sharing: answer & Q? solution?
Sandro Dentella
sandro at pcco2.mi.infn.it
Thu Oct 2 18:54:02 GMT 1997
Hi.
Thanks to all the people that helped me understanding the problem of word
changing permission and group of files. This sum-up of what I figured out
ends with a question/suggestion.
0. Word create file anew and then move it: Owner and group rest the default
one *:-( that'a pain
### My work-around
1. I Create a new service (YES one each group!...) in a part of the tree
*that is not already reachable from other services*!!!
Otherwise it will be accessible in a way controlled by the following rules
or by the rules of the other services depending on the way it is reached.
2. Create a suitable group on the unix system
3. Configure the service like the following.
[ems]
comment = Direttorio gruppo ems
path = /home/services/ems
create mask = 775 # could be 770...
force group = ems
valid users = @ems # all the people belonging to the unix group
writable = yes
root preexec = find /home/services/ems -type d -exec chmod 777 {} \;
This preexec rule is only needed if you want to leave other groups to read
newly created directory (they will be created 775 or so)
4. To avoid riconnecting every time to the service "by hand" you can now make
a symbolic link to the service: Ex.:
mkdir -p /home/services/ems
cd /home/sandro
ln -s /home/services/ems ems
In this way, the rules to access it will be those of the ems service
configuration. Of coure I can have link to single files eather.
So far the work-around.
Now comes my question/suggestion:
Would it be possible to create a new capability so that samba checks the
original mode and if requested preserve it "after" word disconnects? that
would allow for much wider flexibility. (Is this for you, Andrew?).
Anyhow Thanks again to Andrew Tridgell!!
sandro
*:-)
--
Sandro Dentella *:-)
sandro at crcc.it - sandro at pcco2.mi.infn.it
http://www.lucia.it/diade/
More information about the samba
mailing list