Samba broken again - any ideas?
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at switchboard.net
Fri Nov 7 15:31:55 GMT 1997
On Sat, 8 Nov 1997, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Graham Leggett wrote:
> > Louis Mandelstam wrote:
> > > > A general question: Why is samba so unreliable? I have used different
> > > > versions of samba for over two years, and between then and now samba has
> > > > been very unreliable, and doesn't look at becoming more reliable now.
> > > > BUT - having said this I have almost never had the slightest problem
> > > > with samba clients connecting to samba shares, all my problems occur
> > > > Win95 -> samba. BUT having said THAT, Win95 -> Win95 works fine.
> > >
> > > FWIW, Samba's been rock solid here no matter what I throw at it.
> > I think at this stage our samba problems are related to reverse DNS,
reverse dns? um... can you explain this one a little more: i don't quite
follow how this would have an effect.
> > because every time our internet connection goes down, samba doesn't work
> > properly.
<a href="mailto:lkcl at switchboard.net" > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton </a>
<a href="http://mailhost.cb1.com/~lkcl"> Lynx2.7-friendly Home Page </a>
<br><b> "Apply the Laws of Nature to your environment because your
environment applies the Laws of Nature to you" </b>
More information about the samba