Amanda 2.3.0.5-Samba 1.9.16p11 PC backups...
Ernie Oporto
ernie_oporto at MENTORG.COM
Fri Jul 25 20:47:31 GMT 1997
At 04:43 PM 7/25/97 -0300, you wrote:
>Ernie Oporto writes:
>
>> At 04:05 PM 7/25/97 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> Ernie Oporto writes:
>>>> Also, the smbclient call only seems to be working for NT servers. All of
>>>> the Win95 machines reject the connection. The Win95 machines are set to
>>>> User-level access control to the same server that samba is running on.
>>>
>>> Well, if smbclient cannot access Win95 hosts, it is a problem in your
>>> Win95 configuration or in samba, not it amanda.
>
>> Ignoring Win95 for the moment, the server I *was* able to connect to is a
>> Windows NT machine. Samba-amanda doesn't work there and gives the message
>> that I posted.
>
>I had told you in my last message that you should not use backslashes
>(\); use slashes (/) instead. Besides, amanda will never perform a
>level-0 backup in degraded mode, that is, if it does not have a tape
>to write to.
I changed that to regular slashes and it got rid of some of the messages in
the AMANDA logs. The tape is a problem through, since I was hoping to just
dump to holding area. I'm still testing this all out, so I didn't want to
commit to adding a tape drive. Looks like I'll have to do that now.
>There are also two patches in the patches page related with SAMBA
>support. I hope you have applied them, but they do not have anything
>to do with the problems you've got so far.
Since I'm using AMANDA 2.3.0.5, I am assuming those patches are already in
there. Yes?
-Ernie
--
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9276
_____/ ____ / /Ernie "Shokk" Oporto-SysAdmin
_____ ____ / \ __ / __ Mentor Graphics Corporation
\______/ __ __ \______/ __ \___ __ \___
More information about the samba
mailing list