HP CIFS vs JYC SAMBA 2.2.8

[Michael Ober]

OK - I made the transition and found one bug (reported to HP already)
and one medium level difference between the two versions of Samba.  The
bug is that you _MUST_ have the statement "follow symlinks = Yes" in the
[global] section.  This has been confirmed as a bug in the base samba
version by Jeremy Allison and I gave HP the reference to his
confirmation.  The medium level difference is that JYC handled VFC files
properly and HP CIFS doesn't handle them.  I worked around this by
converting the VFC text files to Sequential Stream via the convert/fdl
utility.
 
Performance wise HP CIFS is about twice as fast as for file IO and even
faster for directories with large numbers of files.  In addition, once I
hooked to our Windows AD domain connections have been seamless.
 
Mike Ober.
 

________________________________

From: Aravinda Guzzar [mailto:aguzzar at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:58 PM
To: Michael Ober
Cc: samba-vms at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: HP CIFS vs JYC SAMBA 2.2.8


Hi Mike,
 
yes there are lots of benefits migrating from 2.2.8 to the latest
version of CIFS on VMS. 
 
It is been qualified on the latest hardware of Itanium and Alpha, with
the latest OSes. There is support for VMS specific file formats viz.
Varaible Length formats, StreamLF and supports ODS2 disks also. It is
been qualified on the clusters also. So you will get the benefit of the
clusters.
 
Please note that you need to have the latest CRTL patches. before you
migrate and as a suggestion please test the software on your test
hardwares, and convince yourself before migrating to the production.
 
Regards
Aravind

 
On 5/9/08, Michael Ober <mdo at wakeassoc.com> wrote: 

	Now that HP's CIFS has been out for a few months, are there any
benefits
	to migrating from JYC's Samba 2.2.8 to HP CIFS?
	
	Thanks,
	Mike Ober.
	
	PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
	
	http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
	




-- 
Aravinda
(Views expressed here are my personal opinion ONLY)