Samba/VMS Version 2.2.8 Build 20041021

[COLLOT Jean-Yves]

> Is it easy to find the changed files ?
Yes, the changed files are the ones changed since the 8th of September.

> Is there any point to building on VMS 7.3-1 or later with out
> large file support ?
I guess not, but may be some people should want it (I can't really imagine
why).

Actually, I must admit that I did not spend too much time thinking about
this. I am completely aware that there should be a lot of things to do in
order to enhance the compile/link/install procedures, but I had no time
enough to do it.

JY

-----Message d'origine-----
De : wb8tyw at qsl.net [mailto:wb8tyw at qsl.net] 
Envoyé : jeudi 21 octobre 2004 18:13
À : samba-vms at lists.samba.org
Objet : Re: Samba/VMS Version 2.2.8 Build 20041021

In article <CF0913E9C3D53D4E94DE47FDE25C633D054CDF2E at hermes.cofiroute.com>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <jean-yves.collot at cofiroute.fr> writes:
> I have just posted a new release that fixes some problems that happened to
> some of you.
>
> More information and download available, as usual, at
> http://www.pi-net.dyndns.org/anonymous/jyc/

Is it easy to find the changed files so that I can merge them into my
2.2.12 build?  Like using the date to extract them?

Also, is there any point to building on VMS 7.3-1 or later with out
large file support?  If not, then the DCL procedures can detect the host
VMS version and make the correct changes.

Otherwise a parameter such as P3 could be used to override the default.

The objects proceduced by compiling on VMS 7.3-1 can not be relied on to
be correct for linking on older versions of VMS unless a very complex
development environment is set up, so that should not be a reason for
keeping
the command procedures separate.

-John
wb8tyw at qsl.net
Personal Opinion Only

PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html