samba 2.2.8/time.c Question on VMS specific modification.

[John E. Malmberg]

In article <CF0913E9C3D53D4E94DE47FDE25C633D0532F408 at hermes.cofiroute.com>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <jean-yves.collot at cofiroute.fr> writes:
> Actually, the reason is not a performance one, but the "optimized" Samba
> code does not correctly give the tm_isdst and the tm_gmtoff members of the
> tm struct.

Now I need to find out if this is a VMS C RTL bug or a SAMBA bug, as
there should not be a difference.

The "optimized" SAMBA code is complex enough that I can not tell at a
glance where the bug is actually at.

Thanks.


Jean-Yves,

Can you set your mailer to not put a space the "RE" tag before the ":"?
It should be the vendor's default setting.

If the news/e-mail programs do not see "RE: " at the beginning of a subject
line on a reply, they add one on each reply.

And the news/e-mail clients/archivers also use the subject line to verify
the thread context, and if they do not see that it is different only by
a "Re:" or a "RE:", they assume that this is the start of a new thread, and
not the continuation of one.

It is causing confusion on tracking threads in the archive and the newsgroup.

Thanks,

-John
wb8tyw at qsl.net
Personal Opinion Only