Problem connecting to samba-2.0.3/vms
georges.bert at Lafarge-Ciments.Lafarge.com
georges.bert at Lafarge-Ciments.Lafarge.com
Wed Jun 26 12:33:51 GMT 2002
Hello,
I have successfully installed SAMBA-2.0.3 on a VAX running VMS-6.2 and TCPWARE-5.4-3 (this VAX's name is CLFTS2).
I installed the same SAMBA-2.0.3 on another VAX (name = CLF10U) ... but now I'm not able to get the smbd working correctly on this new VAX.
I've found the following behaviours :
A. Using smbclient, I can get a response from the old VAX (CLFT2).
Example :
10U_SY $ mc samba_exe:smbclient "-L" clfts2 "-N"
Added interface ip=192.168.10.1 bcast=192.168.10.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Domain=[CLFTS2_D] OS=[OpenVMS] Server=[Samba 2.0.3]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
public Disk Partage
test Disk Test
IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba-2.0.3/VMS)
Server Comment
--------- -------
Workgroup Master
--------- -------
AUTOMATION S_DEVEL
CLF02S_D S01ARM
CLFTS2_D CLFTS2_SMB
IDFBFRTCP01M LGS-OPF700JDNMD
LAFCIM LCSIE01
LCJDE LCJDE00
10U_SY $
B. Using smbclient, I can't get a positive response from the new VAX (CLF10U).
Example :
10U_SY $ mc samba_exe:smbclient "-L" clf10u "-N"
Added interface ip=192.168.10.1 bcast=192.168.10.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
session request to CLF10U failed
session request to *SMBSERVER failed
10U_SY $
Following are several files that may give some information:
tcpware:NETCP.LOG
-----------------
...
** 26-JUN-2002 13:38:52 TCP connection established on _BG1009: from 192.168.10.1,1546 to
192.168.10.1,139.
Created process SMBD_151 (00002080) to service _BG1009:
** 26-JUN-2002 13:38:55 TCP connection established on _BG1017: from 192.168.10.1,1547 to
192.168.10.1,139.
Created process SMBD_152 (00002081) to service _BG1017:
** 26-JUN-2002 13:38:55 Server process 00002080 exited with status.
%C-E-NOMSG, Message number 1035A00A
** 26-JUN-2002 13:38:58 Server process 00002081 exited with status.
%C-E-NOMSG, Message number 1035A00A
samba_root:[000000]LOG.SMB
--------------------------
...
[2002/06/26 13:38:55, 1] DSA1:[KITS.SAMBA-2_0_3.SOURCE.LIB]SYSTEM.C;1:(362)
WARNING: no chroot!
[2002/06/26 13:38:55, 0] DSA1:[KITS.SAMBA-2_0_3.SOURCE.SMBD]OPLOCK.C;1:(79)
open_oplock_ipc: Failed to get local UDP socket for address 100007f. Error was
can't assign requested address
[2002/06/26 13:38:57, 1] DSA1:[KITS.SAMBA-2_0_3.SOURCE.LIB]SYSTEM.C;1:(362)
WARNING: no chroot!
[2002/06/26 13:38:57, 0] DSA1:[KITS.SAMBA-2_0_3.SOURCE.SMBD]OPLOCK.C;1:(79)
open_oplock_ipc: Failed to get local UDP socket for address 100007f. Error was
can't assign requested address
samba_root:[LIB]SMB.CONF
------------------------
[global]
workgroup = CLF10U_D
netbios name = clf10u_smb
server string = Samba-%v/VMS
log file = /samba_log/log.%m
security = user
max log size = 50
dns proxy = no
preferred master = no
encrypt passwords = no
guest account = SAMBA$GUEST
map to guest = bad user
dead time = 10
map archive = no
share modes = no
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
[A1MWIN]
comment = *** supprime ***
path = /clf10u$dka200/pcsa.softspc/a1mwin
guest ok = no
[APPROU11]
path = /clf10u$dka300/pcsax/approu11
guest ok = no
[AUDITU11]
comment = INVENTAIRE PARC MATERIEL LAN AUDITOR
path = /clf10u$dka300/pcsax/auditu11
guest ok = yes
writeable = yes
...
Note: at the present time, both VAXes are still running PATHWORKS (via DECnet only).
At this point I'm not able to go further analyzing the problem. If someone has an idea ...
Thanks in advance, Georges
"This e-mail is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not copy, distribute,
disclose or use the information it contains. Please e-mail the sender immediately and delete this message from your system. E-mails are susceptible
to corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment; we do not accept liability for any such changes, or for their consequences. You should be
aware, that the company may monitor your emails and their content"
More information about the samba-vms
mailing list