[PATCH v2 101/127] smb: server: make use of smbdirect_connection_{alloc, free}_send_io()
Stefan Metzmacher
metze at samba.org
Wed Oct 29 13:21:19 UTC 2025
These are basically copies of smb_direct_{alloc,free}_sendmsg() just
a bit simpler and with the gfp_mask mask abstracted.
For now we still use KSMBD_DEFAULT_GFP, which includes
__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL.
The only difference is that we use ib_dma_unmap_page() for all sges,
this simplifies the logic and doesn't matter as
ib_dma_unmap_single() and ib_dma_unmap_page() both operate
on dma_addr_t and dma_unmap_single_attrs() is just an
alias for dma_unmap_page_attrs().
We already had such an inconsistency in the client
code where we use ib_dma_unmap_single(), while we mapped
using ib_dma_map_page().
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon at kernel.org>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench at gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Talpey <tom at talpey.com>
Cc: linux-cifs at vger.kernel.org
Cc: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze at samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench at microsoft.com>
---
fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c | 58 +++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
index 7181d9f62b09..50dc87660b25 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
@@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static struct smb_direct_transport *alloc_transport(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id)
smbdirect_socket_set_logging(sc, NULL,
smb_direct_logging_needed,
smb_direct_logging_vaprintf);
+ sc->send_io.mem.gfp_mask = KSMBD_DEFAULT_GFP;
/*
* from here we operate on the copy.
*/
@@ -354,43 +355,6 @@ static void free_transport(struct smb_direct_transport *t)
ksmbd_conn_free(KSMBD_TRANS(t)->conn);
}
-static struct smbdirect_send_io
-*smb_direct_alloc_sendmsg(struct smbdirect_socket *sc)
-{
- struct smbdirect_send_io *msg;
-
- msg = mempool_alloc(sc->send_io.mem.pool, KSMBD_DEFAULT_GFP);
- if (!msg)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- msg->socket = sc;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msg->sibling_list);
- msg->num_sge = 0;
- return msg;
-}
-
-static void smb_direct_free_sendmsg(struct smbdirect_socket *sc,
- struct smbdirect_send_io *msg)
-{
- int i;
-
- /*
- * The list needs to be empty!
- * The caller should take care of it.
- */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&msg->sibling_list));
-
- if (msg->num_sge > 0) {
- ib_dma_unmap_single(sc->ib.dev,
- msg->sge[0].addr, msg->sge[0].length,
- DMA_TO_DEVICE);
- for (i = 1; i < msg->num_sge; i++)
- ib_dma_unmap_page(sc->ib.dev,
- msg->sge[i].addr, msg->sge[i].length,
- DMA_TO_DEVICE);
- }
- mempool_free(msg, sc->send_io.mem.pool);
-}
-
static int smb_direct_check_recvmsg(struct smbdirect_recv_io *recvmsg)
{
struct smbdirect_socket *sc = recvmsg->socket;
@@ -780,11 +744,11 @@ static void send_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
*/
list_for_each_entry_safe(sibling, next, &sendmsg->sibling_list, sibling_list) {
list_del_init(&sibling->sibling_list);
- smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, sibling);
+ smbdirect_connection_free_send_io(sibling);
lcredits += 1;
}
/* Note this frees wc->wr_cqe, but not wc */
- smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, sendmsg);
+ smbdirect_connection_free_send_io(sendmsg);
lcredits += 1;
if (wc->status != IB_WC_SUCCESS || wc->opcode != IB_WC_SEND) {
@@ -907,9 +871,9 @@ static int smb_direct_flush_send_list(struct smbdirect_socket *sc,
list_for_each_entry_safe(sibling, next, &last->sibling_list, sibling_list) {
list_del_init(&sibling->sibling_list);
- smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, sibling);
+ smbdirect_connection_free_send_io(sibling);
}
- smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, last);
+ smbdirect_connection_free_send_io(last);
}
return ret;
@@ -994,7 +958,7 @@ static int smb_direct_create_header(struct smbdirect_socket *sc,
int header_length;
int ret;
- sendmsg = smb_direct_alloc_sendmsg(sc);
+ sendmsg = smbdirect_connection_alloc_send_io(sc);
if (IS_ERR(sendmsg))
return PTR_ERR(sendmsg);
@@ -1037,7 +1001,7 @@ static int smb_direct_create_header(struct smbdirect_socket *sc,
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
ret = ib_dma_mapping_error(sc->ib.dev, sendmsg->sge[0].addr);
if (ret) {
- smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, sendmsg);
+ smbdirect_connection_free_send_io(sendmsg);
return ret;
}
@@ -1193,7 +1157,7 @@ static int smb_direct_post_send_data(struct smbdirect_socket *sc,
goto err;
return 0;
err:
- smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, msg);
+ smbdirect_connection_free_send_io(msg);
header_failed:
atomic_inc(&sc->send_io.credits.count);
credit_failed:
@@ -1622,7 +1586,7 @@ static int smb_direct_send_negotiate_response(struct smbdirect_socket *sc,
struct smbdirect_negotiate_resp *resp;
int ret;
- sendmsg = smb_direct_alloc_sendmsg(sc);
+ sendmsg = smbdirect_connection_alloc_send_io(sc);
if (IS_ERR(sendmsg))
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1658,7 +1622,7 @@ static int smb_direct_send_negotiate_response(struct smbdirect_socket *sc,
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
ret = ib_dma_mapping_error(sc->ib.dev, sendmsg->sge[0].addr);
if (ret) {
- smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, sendmsg);
+ smbdirect_connection_free_send_io(sendmsg);
return ret;
}
@@ -1668,7 +1632,7 @@ static int smb_direct_send_negotiate_response(struct smbdirect_socket *sc,
ret = post_sendmsg(sc, NULL, sendmsg);
if (ret) {
- smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, sendmsg);
+ smbdirect_connection_free_send_io(sendmsg);
return ret;
}
--
2.43.0
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list