[PATCH 3/5] smb: server: simplify sibling_list handling in smb_direct_flush_send_list/send_done
Stefan Metzmacher
metze at samba.org
Mon Oct 20 18:36:00 UTC 2025
We have a list handling that is much easier to understand:
1. Before smb_direct_flush_send_list() is called all
struct smbdirect_send_io messages are part of
send_ctx->msg_list
2. Before smb_direct_flush_send_list() calls
smb_direct_post_send() we remove the last
element in send_ctx->msg_list and move all
others into last->sibling_list. As only
last has IB_SEND_SIGNALED and gets a completion
vis send_done().
3. send_done() has an easy way to free all others
in sendmsg->sibling_list (if there are any).
And use list_for_each_entry_safe() instead of
a complex custom logic.
This will help us to share send_done() in common
code soon, as it will work fine for the client too,
where last->sibling_list is currently always an empty list.
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon at kernel.org>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench at gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Talpey <tom at talpey.com>
Cc: linux-cifs at vger.kernel.org
Cc: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze at samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench at microsoft.com>
---
fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
index c4df1328342d..e7e2388c00c2 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
@@ -524,6 +524,12 @@ static void smb_direct_free_sendmsg(struct smbdirect_socket *sc,
{
int i;
+ /*
+ * The list needs to be empty!
+ * The caller should take care of it.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&msg->sibling_list));
+
if (msg->num_sge > 0) {
ib_dma_unmap_single(sc->ib.dev,
msg->sge[0].addr, msg->sge[0].length,
@@ -909,9 +915,8 @@ static void smb_direct_post_recv_credits(struct work_struct *work)
static void send_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
{
- struct smbdirect_send_io *sendmsg, *sibling;
+ struct smbdirect_send_io *sendmsg, *sibling, *next;
struct smbdirect_socket *sc;
- struct list_head *pos, *prev, *end;
sendmsg = container_of(wc->wr_cqe, struct smbdirect_send_io, cqe);
sc = sendmsg->socket;
@@ -920,27 +925,26 @@ static void send_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
ib_wc_status_msg(wc->status), wc->status,
wc->opcode);
+ /*
+ * Free possible siblings and then the main send_io
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(sibling, next, &sendmsg->sibling_list, sibling_list) {
+ list_del_init(&sibling->sibling_list);
+ smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, sibling);
+ }
+ /* Note this frees wc->wr_cqe, but not wc */
+ smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, sendmsg);
+
if (wc->status != IB_WC_SUCCESS || wc->opcode != IB_WC_SEND) {
pr_err("Send error. status='%s (%d)', opcode=%d\n",
ib_wc_status_msg(wc->status), wc->status,
wc->opcode);
smb_direct_disconnect_rdma_connection(sc);
+ return;
}
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sc->send_io.pending.count))
wake_up(&sc->send_io.pending.zero_wait_queue);
-
- /* iterate and free the list of messages in reverse. the list's head
- * is invalid.
- */
- for (pos = &sendmsg->sibling_list, prev = pos->prev, end = sendmsg->sibling_list.next;
- prev != end; pos = prev, prev = prev->prev) {
- sibling = container_of(pos, struct smbdirect_send_io, sibling_list);
- smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, sibling);
- }
-
- sibling = container_of(pos, struct smbdirect_send_io, sibling_list);
- smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, sibling);
}
static int manage_credits_prior_sending(struct smbdirect_socket *sc)
@@ -1030,17 +1034,29 @@ static int smb_direct_flush_send_list(struct smbdirect_socket *sc,
last->wr.send_flags = IB_SEND_SIGNALED;
last->wr.wr_cqe = &last->cqe;
+ /*
+ * Remove last from send_ctx->msg_list
+ * and splice the rest of send_ctx->msg_list
+ * to last->sibling_list.
+ *
+ * send_ctx->msg_list is a valid empty list
+ * at the end.
+ */
+ list_del_init(&last->sibling_list);
+ list_splice_tail_init(&send_ctx->msg_list, &last->sibling_list);
+ send_ctx->wr_cnt = 0;
+
ret = smb_direct_post_send(sc, &first->wr);
- if (!ret) {
- smb_direct_send_ctx_init(send_ctx,
- send_ctx->need_invalidate_rkey,
- send_ctx->remote_key);
- } else {
- list_for_each_entry_safe(first, last, &send_ctx->msg_list,
- sibling_list) {
- smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, first);
+ if (ret) {
+ struct smbdirect_send_io *sibling, *next;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(sibling, next, &last->sibling_list, sibling_list) {
+ list_del_init(&sibling->sibling_list);
+ smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, sibling);
}
+ smb_direct_free_sendmsg(sc, last);
}
+
return ret;
}
--
2.43.0
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list