mit-krb5 and heimdal binaries

[Alexander Bokovoy]

On ke, 22 maalis 2023, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-03-20 at 10:39 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > Indeed. For the record, current set of tests not supported by
> > 
> > --with-system-mitkrb5 build:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------
> > 
> > $ cat selftest/skip_mit_kdc
> > 
> > # We do not support RODC yet
> > 
> > .*rodc
> > 
> > .*RODC
> > 
> > ^samba4.ntvfs.cifs.ntlm.base.unlink
> > 
> > ^samba4.ntvfs.cifs.krb5.base.unlink
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > $ cat selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc_1_20 
> 
> ...
> 
> The bulk of the failing tests are in the 'common'
> selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc file, the file you mention above is only for
> tests that are different between 1.20 and prior versions.
> 
> $ wc -l selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc
> 2207 selftest/knownfail_mit_kdc
> 
> It isn't as bad as it seems, and most of the differences simply won't
> matter, which is why I felt confident to make the statement I did
> earlier, but it isn't nearly done either. 
> 
> Thankfully most of the work is to write such a testsuite, and I'm very
> grateful to Metze for starting that work and to Joseph for greatly
> extending it, and in particular to those who funded the time spent. 

+100. The fact that we now have a comprehensive test suite that covers
many aspects of the Kerberos behavior, indepedently of Microsoft's test
suite, is a huge benefit to everyone. Thank to all participants!


-- 
/ Alexander Bokovoy