Samba with GlusterFS - the bug is back?
peljasz at yahoo.co.uk
Wed May 6 18:42:59 UTC 2020
On 06/05/2020 18:09, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:00:34AM +0100, lejeczek via samba-technical wrote:
>> hi guys,
>> I fear this or very similar - https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13585 - is back and I wonder(must be no me alone): would that be(if this same old bug) Centos maintainers' fuckup or it's in the upstream?
>> If anybody here is a glusterfs mail list consumer, then it's "Unable to create new files or folders using samba and vfs_glusterfs"
>> I'll say this is a small catastrophe, once again, for all those of us who run with glusterfs.
>> Would you have advice with a quick fix and/or workaround?
>> many thanks, L.
> Can you re-open a new bug and assign to Anoop. He's probably
> got the resources already set up to look at this.
> What Linux distro are you on ?
Sorry, can't do. I'm not an account holder over there at
samba.org and as you can see I come with Yahoo. Someone else
will have to do that please.
I'm on Centos 7.8 and I've already poked at centos' devel
mail list, also Gluster's.
I took a look at what's in the patch(es) for <4.10v and to
me(not a developer!) it seems that, that code(from Centos'
rpm.src) is patched in(as oppose to via external patched)
already. Yet the error I get is the same(or similar) as then:
"The file '<%1 NULL:NameDest>' is too large for the destination file system."
many thanks, L.
More information about the samba-technical