Retire Fedora 29 / OpenSUSE 15.0 from CI?

Stefan Metzmacher metze at samba.org
Thu Mar 12 08:15:51 UTC 2020


Am 12.03.20 um 04:17 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba-technical:
> G'Day Andreas and the list,
> 
> It bothers me a little that for every Samba change we make we spin up
> 37 builds on 37 VMs.  It feels a little excessive, and while CI is
> awesome when it saves us all time we should also use the earth and
> Samba Team's resources carefully.  (Even jobs aimed at the 'free' CI
> can be run on our servers if GitLab.com's servers are busy, and the
> planet pays either way). 
> 
> Therefore I wondered if we should also stop running CI on Fedora 29 and
> OpenSUSE 15.0, both of which are now it is EOL upstream?
> 
> Both went EOL in Nov/Dec 2019.
> 
> In the future I think we should set policy to only CI on (some, subject
> to other constraints) supported distributions. 

Sounds useful.

metze

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20200312/dd61cb9b/signature.sig>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list