[PATCH] Add support for getting and setting SACLs
boris.v.protopopov at gmail.com
Mon Dec 7 21:23:41 UTC 2020
yes, thanks for the pointer, will include in the future.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:05 PM Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
> Are you talking about this patch "[PATCH] Extend cifs acl utilities to
> handle SACLs"?
> Just for the future, I am trying to monitor the samba-dev mailing list
> but if you would like to get the fastest response to your patches then
> please include me directly or at least the linux-cifs mailing list.
> I stage pending patches in the "next" branch on my github tree, so,
> will include the one above.
> Best regards,
> Pavel Shilovsky
> пн, 7 дек. 2020 г. в 07:28, Boris Protopopov <boris.v.protopopov at gmail.com>:
> > Hello, Shyam,
> > sorry for the delayed reply and thanks for looking at this patch. Yes,
> > the testing was done using the extended versions of
> > getcifsacl/setcifsacl (added setting owner and SACL support), the
> > patch for that posted recently via samba-technical (message ID
> > <20201120214918.12517-1-pboris at amazon.com>). I have tested
> > setting/getting the owner, DACL, and SACL, for all the DACL/SACL flags
> > (-a, -D, -M, -S), SACL type SYSTEM_AUDIT. This testing was done
> > against 5.10.0-rc1 and 4.14.203 (the latter required porting the
> > user-space patch). I believe this testing has fully exercised the code
> > changes in question.
> > I will look at contributing to the fsxtesting-cifs code, but I think
> > the setcifsacl/getcifsact patch that enables easy access to the
> > descriptor components is a pre-requisite for such contributions.
> > Thanks!
More information about the samba-technical