feedback on ldap improvement in samba 4.11

Denis Cardon dcardon at tranquil.it
Thu Nov 14 13:15:09 UTC 2019


Hi Gary,

Le 11/13/2019 à 08:40 PM, Gary Lockyer via samba-technical a écrit :
> That's by design, as I get confused by processes that restart after a
> SIGKILL.

I'm speaking about the ldap worker processes, not about the master ldap 
process. Perhaps I'm confused, but if oomkiller kicks in and SIGKILL a 
worker, I would have thought that it would be nice for a new worker to 
be re-spawned.

Cheers,

Denis

>
> On 13/11/19 23:24, Denis Cardon via samba-technical wrote:
>> About the prefork model, the master ldap process is properly restarting
>> the child process after a SIGTERM but it is not restarting after a
>> SIGKILL. Is it normal?
>
> Ngā mihi
> Gary
>

-- 
Denis Cardon
Tranquil IT
12 avenue Jules Verne (Bat. A)
44230 Saint Sébastien sur Loire (FRANCE)
tel : +33 (0) 240 975 755
http://www.tranquil.it

Tranquil IT recrute! https://www.tranquil.it/nous-rejoindre/
Samba install wiki for Frenchies : https://dev.tranquil.it
WAPT, software deployment made easy : https://wapt.fr



More information about the samba-technical mailing list