Re-index performance - default tdb sizes.

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 12:08 +1300, Gary Lockyer via samba-technical
wrote:
> With the expectation that it would make no difference I changed the size
> the in memory tdb used by re-indexing from 1000 to 100,000 and ran it
> against a 100,000 user domain.  Times went from 16 minutes 30 seconds to
> 44 seconds.
> 
> This does suggest that we should look at the default sizes we use to
> create our tdb databases with especially on larger domains.

In particular, I'm wondering if the default size used for the on-disk
ldb (10,000), winbind's caches (at 10,000) are still appropriate.

I'm also quite concerned that many seem to have 0 passed as the hash
size, which is defaulting to just 131 as I read it! 

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett
https://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team         https://samba.org
Samba Development and Support, Catalyst IT   
https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 862 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20190320/6aa5eb2c/signature.sig>