[PATCH 1/2] cifs: remove unused status severity defines

Steve French smfrench at gmail.com
Thu Mar 14 07:19:53 UTC 2019

All of those uses of __constant_cpu_to_le32 apparently (at least
according to checkpatch) should be changed (someday) to cpu_to_le32
but I didn't research why the change from __constant_cpu_to_le32
--->   cpu_to_le32

If it has benefit - and checkpatch is right (it warned about
__constant_cpu_to_le32 being no longer preferred) ... perhaps would be
worth a followup patch to clean the rest of them up?   If you have any
context on why kernel code has moved away from using the older format
of __constant_cpu_to_.... would be useful to know if any benefit to
the change

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 2:12 AM Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky.work at gmail.com> wrote:
> On (03/14/19 02:04), Steve French wrote:
> [..]
> >  #define STATUS_SEVERITY_SUCCESS __constant_cpu_to_le32(0x0000)
> Does STATUS_SEVERITY_SUCCESS still use __constant_cpu_to_le32?
> > -#define STATUS_SEVERITY_INFORMATIONAL __constanst_cpu_to_le32(0x0001)
> > -#define STATUS_SEVERITY_WARNING __constanst_cpu_to_le32(0x0002)
> > -#define STATUS_SEVERITY_ERROR __constanst_cpu_to_le32(0x0003)
> > +#define STATUS_SEVERITY_INFORMATIONAL cpu_to_le32(0x0001)
> > +#define STATUS_SEVERITY_WARNING cpu_to_le32(0x0002)
> > +#define STATUS_SEVERITY_ERROR cpu_to_le32(0x0003)
> Otherwise looks good.
>         -ss



More information about the samba-technical mailing list