[PATCH] s3:notifyd: Handle sigup in notifyd to reparse smb.conf
Jeremy Allison
jra at samba.org
Wed Jun 26 20:15:46 UTC 2019
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:04:56PM +0000, Shyam Rathi wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
> Please find the attached update patch. I’ve addressed both review comments.
Thanks Shyam, that looks good to me. I'll push
it into gitlab-ci and if it passes create a merge
request.
Jeremy.
> Regards,
> -Shyam
>
> From: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> Reply-To: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> Date: Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 7:42 PM
> To: Shyam Rathi <shyam.rathi at nutanix.com>
> Cc: "samba-technical at lists.samba.org" <samba-technical at lists.samba.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] s3:notifyd: Handle sigup in notifyd to reparse smb.conf
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:18:36AM +0000, Shyam Rathi via samba-technical wrote:
> Thanks for the review Jeremy. Responses inline below.
> + DEBUG(2,("notifyd: Reloading services after SIGHUP\n"));
> ^^^^
> Please use either the DBG_WARNING or DBG_NOTICE macros
> to ensure consistency in new debug info levels.
> ---- I'll make the change.
>
> Thanks !
>
> + become_root();
> + reload_services(NULL, NULL, false);
> + unbecome_root();
> ^^^^^^^
> Does notifyd need become_root()/unbecome_root()
> pairs ? Isn't it always invoked when smbd is root
> and stays as such ?
> ---- The sighup handler for parent smbd calls
> "change_to_root_user()" before calling
> reload_services(). For many other binaries,
> either reload_services() or (un)become_root
> is called first. I mainly kept the same
> behavior. I'm not fully sure about its purpose
> at this place.
>
> None of the notifyd code ever changes credentials,
> so when it runs as root it'll stay that way.
>
> smbd has to change_to_root_user() inside the signal
> handler as it often changes credentials to the current
> attached user, so might not be currently running as
> root.
>
> I don't think you have the same problem inside notifyd
> so you can drop the become_root()/unbecome_root() I
> think.
>
> Test it once you've made the change to make sure :-).
>
> Jeremy.
>
>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list