Order of vfs_objects with fruit and zfsacl
Rouven_Weiler at gmx.net
Thu Jan 17 07:40:37 UTC 2019
I thought the same, but most stable & working is as I wrote. Maybe zfs sends info to stresms_attrs. Otherwise permissions were scrambled...
> Am 17.01.2019 um 08:15 schrieb Ralph Böhme <slow at samba.org>:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 07:54:45AM +0100, Rouven WEILER via samba-technical wrote:
>> I stumbled upon an issue concerning vfs objects fruit together with zfsack
>> It seems to me that there is a special order needed to get that worked in a stable way.
>> The only working option seems to be
>> "vfs objects = catia fruit zfsacl streams_xattr"
>> is that correct? Could you give me a short explanation why?
>> I did not find something in the docs.
> I believe zfsacl should be last.
> Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/
> Samba Developer, SerNet GmbH https://sernet.de/en/samba/
> GPG-Fingerprint FAE2C6088A24252051C559E4AA1E9B7126399E46
More information about the samba-technical